Decidedly not an issue for this PR, but I wonder if I can structure this better to avoid the duplication of the graph definition. Something like:
{% # Pseudocode.
if CSET_CYCLING_MODEL == "case_study":
recurrences = ",".join(f"R1/{date}" for date in CSET_CASE_DATES)
else:
recurrences = CSET_TRIAL_CYCLE_PERIOD
%}
{{recurrences}} = """
metplus_ascii2nc => metplus_point_stat
"""
I'll open a separate issue for this.
Originally posted by @jfrost-mo in #1906 (comment)
This both makes the graph more readable, and avoids the possibility of the two copies getting out of sync.