diff --git a/ERROR_ENUM_STANDARDIZATION_IMPLEMENTATION_PLAN.md b/ERROR_ENUM_STANDARDIZATION_IMPLEMENTATION_PLAN.md
deleted file mode 100644
index 67f22d2..0000000
--- a/ERROR_ENUM_STANDARDIZATION_IMPLEMENTATION_PLAN.md
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,736 +0,0 @@
-# Error Enum Standardization Implementation Plan
-
-**Date**: June 1, 2026  
-**Issue**: Detect Missing Error Enum Standardization  
-**Status**: Planning Phase  
-**Priority**: Medium (Maintainability & Debugging)
-
----
-
-## Overview
-
-This document provides a step-by-step implementation plan to standardize error enums and error classes across the GasGuard codebase, addressing 6 critical inconsistencies identified in the detection report.
-
----
-
-## Phase 1: Create Unified Error Types Module (Non-Breaking)
-
-### 1.1 Create New Error Module Structure
-
-**File**: [src/common/errors/index.ts](src/common/errors/index.ts)
-
-```
-src/
-  common/
-    errors/
-      index.ts              # Main export file
-      base.error.ts         # Base error class
-      validation.error.ts   # Validation-specific errors
-      configuration.error.ts # Config-specific errors
-      rpc.error.ts          # RPC-specific errors
-      pipeline.error.ts     # Pipeline-specific errors
-      types.ts              # Shared interfaces
-```
-
-### 1.2 Create Base Error Class
-
-**File**: `src/common/errors/base.error.ts`
-
-```typescript
-/**
- * Base error class for all GasGuard errors
- * Provides standardized error structure with code, timestamp, and details
- */
-export abstract class GasGuardError extends Error {
-  abstract readonly code: string;
-  readonly timestamp: Date = new Date();
-  
-  constructor(
-    message: string,
-    public readonly details?: Record<string, any>,
-  ) {
-    super(message);
-    this.name = this.constructor.name;
-    Object.setPrototypeOf(this, new.target.prototype);
-  }
-
-  /**
-   * Serialize error to JSON for logging/responses
-   */
-  toJSON() {
-    return {
-      code: this.code,
-      message: this.message,
-      name: this.name,
-      timestamp: this.timestamp,
-      details: this.details,
-      stack: process.env.NODE_ENV !== 'production' ? this.stack : undefined,
-    };
-  }
-}
-```
-
-### 1.3 Create Unified Validation Error Interface
-
-**File**: `src/common/errors/types.ts`
-
-```typescript
-/**
- * Unified validation error detail format
- * Supports both config validation (path-based) and request validation (field-based)
- */
-export interface ValidationErrorDetail {
-  // Config validation (path-based)
-  path?: string;           // Dot notation: "system.environment"
-  
-  // Request validation (field-based)
-  field?: string;          // Form field: "email"
-  
-  // Common fields
-  code: string;            // Machine-readable: "INVALID_EMAIL_FORMAT"
-  message: string;         // Human-readable
-  value?: any;             // The value that failed validation
-  constraint?: string;     // The constraint that failed: "email_format"
-  timestamp?: Date;        // When error occurred
-}
-
-/**
- * Validation warning detail (non-fatal issues)
- */
-export interface ValidationWarningDetail {
-  path?: string;
-  field?: string;
-  code: string;
-  message: string;
-  suggestion?: string;     // How to fix it
-}
-
-/**
- * Standard API error response format
- */
-export interface ApiErrorResponse {
-  error: {
-    code: string;
-    message: string;
-    timestamp: string;
-    requestId?: string;
-    details?: Record<string, any>;
-  };
-  validationErrors?: ValidationErrorDetail[];
-  warnings?: ValidationWarningDetail[];
-  stack?: string;          // Only in non-production
-}
-```
-
-### 1.4 Create Validation Error Class
-
-**File**: `src/common/errors/validation.error.ts`
-
-```typescript
-import { GasGuardError } from './base.error';
-import { ValidationErrorDetail, ValidationWarningDetail } from './types';
-
-export class ValidationError extends GasGuardError {
-  readonly code = 'VALIDATION_ERROR';
-
-  constructor(
-    message: string,
-    public readonly errors: ValidationErrorDetail[],
-    public readonly warnings: ValidationWarningDetail[] = [],
-    details?: Record<string, any>,
-  ) {
-    super(message, details);
-  }
-
-  /**
-   * Create from config validation errors
-   */
-  static fromConfigValidation(
-    errors: ValidationErrorDetail[],
-    warnings: ValidationWarningDetail[] = [],
-  ) {
-    const message = `Config validation failed with ${errors.length} error(s)`;
-    return new ValidationError(message, errors, warnings);
-  }
-
-  /**
-   * Create from field validation errors
-   */
-  static fromFieldValidation(
-    errors: ValidationErrorDetail[],
-    warnings: ValidationWarningDetail[] = [],
-  ) {
-    const message = `Request validation failed with ${errors.length} error(s)`;
-    return new ValidationError(message, errors, warnings);
-  }
-
-  /**
-   * Get summary string for logging
-   */
-  getSummary(): string {
-    return this.errors
-      .map((e) => `  [${e.code}] ${e.path || e.field}: ${e.message}`)
-      .join('\n');
-  }
-}
-```
-
-### 1.5 Create Configuration Error Class
-
-**File**: `src/common/errors/configuration.error.ts`
-
-```typescript
-import { GasGuardError } from './base.error';
-
-export class ConfigurationError extends GasGuardError {
-  readonly code = 'CONFIGURATION_ERROR';
-
-  constructor(
-    message: string,
-    public readonly filePath?: string,
-    public readonly lineNumber?: number,
-    details?: Record<string, any>,
-  ) {
-    super(message, details);
-  }
-}
-```
-
-### 1.6 Create RPC Error Class
-
-**File**: `src/common/errors/rpc.error.ts`
-
-```typescript
-import { GasGuardError } from './base.error';
-
-export class RpcError extends GasGuardError {
-  readonly code = 'RPC_ERROR';
-
-  constructor(
-    message: string,
-    public readonly rpcMethod?: string,
-    public readonly chainId?: number,
-    details?: Record<string, any>,
-  ) {
-    super(message, details);
-  }
-}
-```
-
-### 1.7 Create Pipeline Error Class
-
-**File**: `src/common/errors/pipeline.error.ts`
-
-```typescript
-import { GasGuardError } from './base.error';
-
-export class PipelineError extends GasGuardError {
-  readonly code = 'PIPELINE_ERROR';
-
-  constructor(
-    message: string,
-    public readonly ruleId?: string,
-    public readonly stageId?: string,
-    details?: Record<string, any>,
-  ) {
-    super(message, details);
-  }
-}
-```
-
-### 1.8 Create Main Export File
-
-**File**: `src/common/errors/index.ts`
-
-```typescript
-export { GasGuardError } from './base.error';
-export { ValidationError } from './validation.error';
-export { ConfigurationError } from './configuration.error';
-export { RpcError } from './rpc.error';
-export { PipelineError } from './pipeline.error';
-export type {
-  ValidationErrorDetail,
-  ValidationWarningDetail,
-  ApiErrorResponse,
-} from './types';
-```
-
----
-
-## Phase 2: Migrate Existing Error Definitions
-
-### 2.1 Update [config/validator.ts](src/config/validator.ts)
-
-**Change**: Replace custom `ValidationError` interface with unified type
-
-```typescript
-// OLD: Multiple exports
-export interface ValidationError {
-  path: string;
-  message: string;
-  code: string;
-}
-
-export class ConfigValidationError extends Error {
-  constructor(
-    public readonly errors: ValidationError[],
-    public readonly warnings: ValidationWarning[],
-  ) {
-    // ...
-  }
-}
-
-// NEW: Use unified types
-import {
-  ValidationError as GasGuardValidationError,
-  ValidationErrorDetail,
-  ValidationWarningDetail,
-} from '../common/errors';
-
-// Use ValidationErrorDetail for config validation
-export type ConfigValidationError = ValidationErrorDetail;
-
-// Use GasGuardValidationError for class
-export { GasGuardValidationError };
-```
-
-### 2.2 Update [stellar/errors.ts](apps/api/src/validation/rpc/stellar/errors.ts)
-
-**Change**: Extend new RpcError class instead of Error
-
-```typescript
-// OLD
-export class RpcValidationError extends Error {
-  constructor(message: string) {
-    super(message);
-    this.name = "RpcValidationError";
-  }
-}
-
-// NEW
-import { RpcError } from '../../../common/errors';
-
-export class RpcValidationError extends RpcError {
-  constructor(
-    message: string,
-    rpcMethod?: string,
-    chainId?: number,
-    details?: Record<string, any>,
-  ) {
-    super(message, rpcMethod, chainId, details);
-  }
-}
-```
-
-### 2.3 Update [error.middleware.ts](apps/api/src/middleware/error.middleware.ts)
-
-**Change**: Use unified error response format
-
-```typescript
-// OLD
-export interface CustomError extends Error {
-  statusCode?: number;
-  code?: string;
-  details?: any;
-}
-
-// NEW
-import { GasGuardError, ApiErrorResponse } from '../common/errors';
-
-export function errorHandler(
-  error: Error | GasGuardError,
-  req: Request,
-  res: Response,
-  next: NextFunction
-): void {
-  const statusCode = 
-    error instanceof GasGuardError ? 
-      getStatusCodeForError(error) : 
-      500;
-
-  const response: ApiErrorResponse = {
-    error: {
-      code: error instanceof GasGuardError ? error.code : 'INTERNAL_SERVER_ERROR',
-      message: error.message,
-      timestamp: new Date().toISOString(),
-      requestId: req.headers['x-request-id'] as string,
-      details: error instanceof GasGuardError ? error.details : undefined,
-    },
-    ...(error instanceof ValidationError && {
-      validationErrors: error.errors,
-      warnings: error.warnings,
-    }),
-    ...(process.env.NODE_ENV !== 'production' && { stack: error.stack }),
-  };
-
-  res.status(statusCode).json(response);
-}
-```
-
-### 2.4 Update [base.validator.ts](apps/api/src/validation/base.validator.ts)
-
-**Change**: Use unified ValidationErrorDetail interface
-
-```typescript
-// OLD
-export interface ValidationError {
-  field: string;
-  message: string;
-  value?: any;
-  constraint: string;
-}
-
-// NEW
-import { ValidationErrorDetail } from '../../../common/errors';
-
-// No need to redefine - use the import
-export type ValidationError = ValidationErrorDetail;
-```
-
-### 2.5 Update [analysis.schema.ts](apps/api/src/schemas/analysis.schema.ts)
-
-**Change**: Import unified error types
-
-```typescript
-// OLD
-export interface ValidationError {
-  field: string;
-  message: string;
-  value?: any;
-  constraint: string;
-}
-
-export interface ApiErrorResponse {
-  error: {
-    code: string;
-    message: string;
-    details?: any;
-    timestamp: string;
-    requestId: string;
-  };
-  validationErrors?: ValidationError[];
-}
-
-// NEW
-import {
-  ValidationErrorDetail,
-  ApiErrorResponse as GasGuardApiErrorResponse,
-} from '../../../common/errors';
-
-// Re-export with type alias for compatibility
-export type ValidationError = ValidationErrorDetail;
-export type ApiErrorResponse = GasGuardApiErrorResponse;
-```
-
----
-
-## Phase 3: Standardize Rust Error Handling
-
-### 3.1 Create Rust Error Module
-
-**File**: `packages/rules/src/errors.rs`
-
-```rust
-use thiserror::Error;
-
-#[derive(Debug, Error)]
-pub enum GasGuardError {
-    #[error("Validation error: {message}")]
-    Validation {
-        code: String,
-        message: String,
-    },
-
-    #[error("Configuration error: {0}")]
-    Configuration(String),
-
-    #[error("RPC error: {0}")]
-    Rpc(String),
-
-    #[error("Pipeline error: {0}")]
-    Pipeline(String),
-
-    #[error("Parse error: {0}")]
-    Parse(String),
-
-    #[error(transparent)]
-    Io(#[from] std::io::Error),
-}
-
-impl GasGuardError {
-    pub fn code(&self) -> &str {
-        match self {
-            GasGuardError::Validation { code, .. } => code,
-            GasGuardError::Configuration(_) => "CONFIGURATION_ERROR",
-            GasGuardError::Rpc(_) => "RPC_ERROR",
-            GasGuardError::Pipeline(_) => "PIPELINE_ERROR",
-            GasGuardError::Parse(_) => "PARSE_ERROR",
-            GasGuardError::Io(_) => "IO_ERROR",
-        }
-    }
-}
-
-pub type Result<T> = std::result::Result<T, GasGuardError>;
-```
-
-### 3.2 Update [soroban/mod.rs](packages/rules/src/soroban/mod.rs)
-
-**Change**: Use unified GasGuardError
-
-```rust
-// OLD
-#[derive(Debug, thiserror::Error)]
-pub enum SorobanParseError {
-    #[error("Failed to parse Soroban contract: {0}")]
-    ParseError(String),
-    // ...
-}
-
-// NEW
-use crate::errors::{GasGuardError, Result};
-
-// Replace SorobanParseError with GasGuardError
-pub type SorobanResult<T> = Result<T>;
-
-// Use in functions:
-pub fn parse_contract(source: &str) -> SorobanResult<Contract> {
-    // ...
-    if !source.contains("contract") {
-        return Err(GasGuardError::Parse(
-            "Invalid contract structure".into()
-        ));
-    }
-    Ok(contract)
-}
-```
-
-### 3.3 Update [lib.rs](libs/rule-engine/src/lib.rs)
-
-**Change**: Use thiserror + unified error enum
-
-```rust
-// OLD
-#[derive(Debug, Clone)]
-pub enum PipelineError {
-    CircularDependency(Vec<String>),
-    // ...
-}
-
-impl std::fmt::Display for PipelineError {
-    // Manual implementation
-}
-
-// NEW
-use thiserror::Error;
-
-#[derive(Debug, Error)]
-pub enum PipelineError {
-    #[error("Circular dependency detected: {}", .0.join(" -> "))]
-    CircularDependency(Vec<String>),
-
-    #[error("Missing dependency: {0}")]
-    MissingDependency(String),
-
-    #[error("Rule execution failed: {0}")]
-    RuleExecutionFailed(String),
-}
-
-pub type PipelineResult<T> = std::result::Result<T, PipelineError>;
-```
-
----
-
-## Phase 4: Integration Testing
-
-### 4.1 Create Error Standardization Tests
-
-**File**: `tests/error-standardization.spec.ts`
-
-```typescript
-import {
-  ValidationError,
-  ConfigurationError,
-  RpcError,
-  PipelineError,
-} from '../src/common/errors';
-
-describe('Error Standardization', () => {
-  describe('ValidationError', () => {
-    it('should serialize to JSON with code and timestamp', () => {
-      const error = new ValidationError(
-        'Test error',
-        [{ code: 'TEST', message: 'Test message' }]
-      );
-      const json = error.toJSON();
-      expect(json.code).toBe('VALIDATION_ERROR');
-      expect(json.timestamp).toBeDefined();
-    });
-
-    it('should support config validation factory', () => {
-      const error = ValidationError.fromConfigValidation([
-        {
-          path: 'system.environment',
-          code: 'INVALID_ENV',
-          message: 'Invalid environment',
-        },
-      ]);
-      expect(error.errors[0].path).toBe('system.environment');
-    });
-
-    it('should support field validation factory', () => {
-      const error = ValidationError.fromFieldValidation([
-        {
-          field: 'email',
-          code: 'INVALID_EMAIL',
-          message: 'Invalid email format',
-        },
-      ]);
-      expect(error.errors[0].field).toBe('email');
-    });
-  });
-
-  describe('Error Response Format', () => {
-    it('should match ApiErrorResponse interface', () => {
-      const error = new ValidationError('Test', []);
-      const response: ApiErrorResponse = {
-        error: {
-          code: error.code,
-          message: error.message,
-          timestamp: error.timestamp.toISOString(),
-        },
-      };
-      expect(response.error.code).toBe('VALIDATION_ERROR');
-    });
-  });
-});
-```
-
-### 4.2 Add Backwards Compatibility Tests
-
-```typescript
-describe('Backwards Compatibility', () => {
-  it('should accept old ValidationError format from config', () => {
-    const oldFormat = {
-      path: 'system.environment',
-      code: 'INVALID_ENV',
-      message: 'Invalid environment',
-    };
-    // Should work with new ValidationErrorDetail
-    const error = new ValidationError('Test', [oldFormat]);
-    expect(error.errors[0].path).toBe(oldFormat.path);
-  });
-
-  it('should accept old ValidationError format from fields', () => {
-    const oldFormat = {
-      field: 'email',
-      constraint: 'email_format',
-      message: 'Invalid email',
-      code: 'INVALID_EMAIL',
-    };
-    // Should work with new ValidationErrorDetail
-    const error = new ValidationError('Test', [oldFormat]);
-    expect(error.errors[0].field).toBe(oldFormat.field);
-  });
-});
-```
-
----
-
-## Phase 5: Migration Checklist
-
-### Preparation
-- [ ] Create feature branch: `feat/errors-381-standardization`
-- [ ] Run current tests to establish baseline
-- [ ] Document current error behavior in each module
-
-### Implementation
-- [ ] Create `src/common/errors/` module (Phase 1)
-- [ ] Update TypeScript error definitions (Phase 2)
-- [ ] Update Rust error definitions (Phase 3)
-- [ ] Add comprehensive tests (Phase 4)
-- [ ] Update error middleware to use new types
-- [ ] Update all validators to use new types
-
-### Testing
-- [ ] Unit tests pass
-- [ ] Integration tests pass
-- [ ] Error middleware tests pass
-- [ ] Backwards compatibility tests pass
-- [ ] E2E tests pass
-
-### Validation
-- [ ] Code review
-- [ ] Manual testing of error responses
-- [ ] Verify error codes in logs
-- [ ] Verify timestamps are present
-- [ ] Test production error handling (no stack traces)
-
-### Documentation
-- [ ] Update ERROR_HANDLING.md with new patterns
-- [ ] Add code examples for extending GasGuardError
-- [ ] Document error code registry
-- [ ] Update API documentation with error responses
-
-### Deployment
-- [ ] Merge to main
-- [ ] Deploy to staging
-- [ ] Deploy to production
-- [ ] Monitor error logs for issues
-
----
-
-## 🔍 Verification Checklist
-
-After implementation, verify:
-
-- [ ] All error classes extend GasGuardError
-- [ ] All errors have a `code` property
-- [ ] All errors have a `timestamp` property
-- [ ] No duplicate ValidationError definitions
-- [ ] All error responses use ApiErrorResponse format
-- [ ] Rust errors use `thiserror` consistently
-- [ ] Error middleware handles all GasGuardError types
-- [ ] Tests cover all error scenarios
-- [ ] Documentation is up to date
-
----
-
-## 📋 Files Modified Summary
-
-### Created
-- `src/common/errors/index.ts`
-- `src/common/errors/base.error.ts`
-- `src/common/errors/validation.error.ts`
-- `src/common/errors/configuration.error.ts`
-- `src/common/errors/rpc.error.ts`
-- `src/common/errors/pipeline.error.ts`
-- `src/common/errors/types.ts`
-- `tests/error-standardization.spec.ts`
-- `packages/rules/src/errors.rs`
-
-### Modified
-- `src/config/validator.ts`
-- `apps/api/src/validation/rpc/stellar/errors.ts`
-- `apps/api/src/middleware/error.middleware.ts`
-- `apps/api/src/validation/base.validator.ts`
-- `apps/api/src/schemas/analysis.schema.ts`
-- `packages/rules/src/soroban/mod.rs`
-- `libs/rule-engine/src/lib.rs`
-
----
-
-## 📊 Estimated Effort
-
-| Phase | Task | Effort | Duration |
-|-------|------|--------|----------|
-| 1 | Create unified error module | 3 hrs | 1 day |
-| 2 | Migrate TypeScript errors | 4 hrs | 2 days |
-| 3 | Migrate Rust errors | 2 hrs | 1 day |
-| 4 | Create tests | 3 hrs | 1 day |
-| 5 | Code review & fixes | 2 hrs | 1 day |
-| | **TOTAL** | **14 hrs** | **~1 week** |
-
----
-
-**Status**: Ready for development  
-**Next Step**: Start Phase 1 implementation
diff --git a/ERROR_ENUM_STANDARDIZATION_QUICK_REF.md b/ERROR_ENUM_STANDARDIZATION_QUICK_REF.md
deleted file mode 100644
index 19bffcb..0000000
--- a/ERROR_ENUM_STANDARDIZATION_QUICK_REF.md
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,247 +0,0 @@
-# Error Enum Standardization - Quick Reference
-
-**Status**: ✅ Detection Complete | Ready for Implementation  
-**Issue**: #381 - Detect Missing Error Enum Standardization  
-**Branch**: feat/issues381
-
----
-
-## 📌 Quick Summary
-
-**Problem**: 6 major inconsistencies in error definitions  
-**Files Affected**: 7+ TypeScript and Rust files  
-**Solution**: Create unified error module with standard base class  
-**Effort**: ~14 hours  
-**Priority**: Medium (Maintainability)
-
----
-
-## 🔴 The 4 Key Issues
-
-### 1️⃣ Three ValidationError Definitions
-- **Variant A** ([src/config/validator.ts](src/config/validator.ts#L25)): `{ path, message, code }`
-- **Variant B** ([apps/api/src/validation/base.validator.ts](apps/api/src/validation/base.validator.ts#L3)): `{ field, message, value, constraint }`
-- **Variant C** ([apps/api/src/schemas/analysis.schema.ts](apps/api/src/schemas/analysis.schema.ts#L153)): Duplicate of B
-
-**Fix**: Merge into single `ValidationErrorDetail` interface supporting both formats
-
----
-
-### 2️⃣ Four Error Class Patterns
-| Class | Pattern | Problem |
-|-------|---------|---------|
-| `RpcValidationError` | Constructor-only | No code/details |
-| `ConfigValidationError` | Rich constructor | Unique pattern |
-| `CustomError` | Interface | Not a class |
-| Missing | Response-only | No class |
-
-**Fix**: Base class `GasGuardError extends Error` with `code` and `timestamp` properties
-
----
-
-### 3️⃣ Two Error Response Formats
-- **Format A**: `{ error: { code, message, details, timestamp, requestId } }`
-- **Format B**: Same + `validationErrors?: ValidationError[]`
-
-**Fix**: Single `ApiErrorResponse` interface with optional arrays
-
----
-
-### 4️⃣ Rust Error Pattern Inconsistency
-- **Good**: `SorobanParseError` uses `thiserror::Error`
-- **Bad**: `PipelineError` uses manual Display impl
-
-**Fix**: All Rust enums use `#[derive(Debug, thiserror::Error)]`
-
----
-
-## 📚 Documentation Files
-
-### Main Reports
-1. **[ERROR_ENUM_STANDARDIZATION_REPORT.md](ERROR_ENUM_STANDARDIZATION_REPORT.md)**
-   - Detailed analysis of all inconsistencies
-   - Code examples and comparisons
-   - File-by-file breakdown
-
-2. **[ERROR_ENUM_STANDARDIZATION_IMPLEMENTATION_PLAN.md](ERROR_ENUM_STANDARDIZATION_IMPLEMENTATION_PLAN.md)**
-   - 5-phase implementation roadmap
-   - Code templates for each error class
-   - Testing strategy
-   - Migration checklist
-
-3. **[ERROR_ENUM_STANDARDIZATION_SUMMARY.md](ERROR_ENUM_STANDARDIZATION_SUMMARY.md)**
-   - Executive summary
-   - Impact analysis
-   - Benefits overview
-
-4. **This Document**: Quick reference guide
-
----
-
-## 🎯 Implementation Phases
-
-### Phase 1: Create Unified Error Module (Non-breaking)
-```
-src/common/errors/
-├── base.error.ts         # GasGuardError abstract class
-├── validation.error.ts   # ValidationError extends GasGuardError
-├── configuration.error.ts
-├── rpc.error.ts
-├── pipeline.error.ts
-└── types.ts              # Shared interfaces
-```
-
-### Phase 2: Migrate TypeScript
-Update these files to import from new module:
-- [src/config/validator.ts](src/config/validator.ts)
-- [apps/api/src/validation/rpc/stellar/errors.ts](apps/api/src/validation/rpc/stellar/errors.ts)
-- [apps/api/src/middleware/error.middleware.ts](apps/api/src/middleware/error.middleware.ts)
-- [apps/api/src/validation/base.validator.ts](apps/api/src/validation/base.validator.ts)
-- [apps/api/src/schemas/analysis.schema.ts](apps/api/src/schemas/analysis.schema.ts)
-
-### Phase 3: Migrate Rust
-Update Rust error enums:
-- [packages/rules/src/soroban/mod.rs](packages/rules/src/soroban/mod.rs)
-- [libs/rule-engine/src/lib.rs](libs/rule-engine/src/lib.rs)
-
-### Phase 4: Testing
-Add comprehensive tests for error standardization
-
-### Phase 5: Migration Validation
-- Code review
-- Testing
-- Deployment
-
----
-
-## ✨ Unified Error Structure (Target)
-
-### Base Class
-```typescript
-abstract class GasGuardError extends Error {
-  abstract code: string;
-  timestamp: Date = new Date();
-  details?: Record<string, any>;
-  toJSON(): object;
-}
-```
-
-### ValidationErrorDetail Interface
-```typescript
-interface ValidationErrorDetail {
-  // Config validation
-  path?: string;        // "system.environment"
-  
-  // Request validation
-  field?: string;       // "email"
-  
-  // Common
-  code: string;         // "INVALID_EMAIL"
-  message: string;      // "Invalid email format"
-  value?: any;          // The bad value
-  constraint?: string;  // "email_format"
-}
-```
-
-### Standard Response
-```typescript
-interface ApiErrorResponse {
-  error: {
-    code: string;
-    message: string;
-    timestamp: string;
-    requestId?: string;
-    details?: Record<string, any>;
-  };
-  validationErrors?: ValidationErrorDetail[];
-  warnings?: ValidationWarningDetail[];
-  stack?: string;  // Non-production only
-}
-```
-
----
-
-## 🔗 File Cross-References
-
-### Files with Inconsistencies
-
-| File | Issue | Type | Severity |
-|------|-------|------|----------|
-| [src/config/validator.ts](src/config/validator.ts) | ConfigValidationError class | Class Pattern | Medium |
-| [apps/api/src/validation/rpc/stellar/errors.ts](apps/api/src/validation/rpc/stellar/errors.ts) | RpcValidationError class | Class Pattern | Medium |
-| [apps/api/src/middleware/error.middleware.ts](apps/api/src/middleware/error.middleware.ts) | CustomError interface | Interface | Low |
-| [apps/api/src/validation/base.validator.ts](apps/api/src/validation/base.validator.ts) | ValidationError interface | Duplicate (Variant B) | High |
-| [apps/api/src/schemas/analysis.schema.ts](apps/api/src/schemas/analysis.schema.ts) | ValidationError interface | Duplicate (Variant C) | High |
-| [packages/rules/src/soroban/mod.rs](packages/rules/src/soroban/mod.rs) | SorobanParseError enum | Rust Pattern | Low |
-| [libs/rule-engine/src/lib.rs](libs/rule-engine/src/lib.rs) | PipelineError enum | Rust Pattern | Low |
-
----
-
-## 📊 Stats
-
-- **Total Inconsistencies Found**: 6
-- **Files Requiring Changes**: 7+
-- **New Files to Create**: 6
-- **Estimated Implementation Time**: 14 hours
-- **Risk Level**: Low (additive changes)
-- **Type Safety Improvement**: Medium → High
-
----
-
-## ✅ Checklist for Review
-
-### Before Starting Implementation
-- [ ] Review [ERROR_ENUM_STANDARDIZATION_REPORT.md](ERROR_ENUM_STANDARDIZATION_REPORT.md)
-- [ ] Review [ERROR_ENUM_STANDARDIZATION_IMPLEMENTATION_PLAN.md](ERROR_ENUM_STANDARDIZATION_IMPLEMENTATION_PLAN.md)
-- [ ] Verify all file references are correct
-- [ ] Confirm effort estimate (14 hours)
-- [ ] Assign implementation owner
-
-### During Implementation
-- [ ] Create Phase 1: Error module
-- [ ] Create Phase 2: TypeScript migrations
-- [ ] Create Phase 3: Rust migrations
-- [ ] Create Phase 4: Tests
-- [ ] Code review checkpoints
-
-### After Implementation
-- [ ] All tests pass
-- [ ] No breaking changes
-- [ ] Documentation updated
-- [ ] Error codes in logs verified
-- [ ] Monitor production for issues
-
----
-
-## 🚀 Getting Started
-
-### Step 1: Understand the Problem
-Read: [ERROR_ENUM_STANDARDIZATION_REPORT.md](ERROR_ENUM_STANDARDIZATION_REPORT.md#-critical-inconsistencies)
-
-### Step 2: Review the Solution
-Read: [ERROR_ENUM_STANDARDIZATION_IMPLEMENTATION_PLAN.md](ERROR_ENUM_STANDARDIZATION_IMPLEMENTATION_PLAN.md#phase-1-create-unified-error-types-module-non-breaking)
-
-### Step 3: Create Feature Branch
-```bash
-git checkout -b feat/errors-381-standardization
-```
-
-### Step 4: Implement Phase 1
-Create the new error module as detailed in the implementation plan
-
-### Step 5: Test and Deploy
-Run tests, code review, merge, and deploy
-
----
-
-## 📞 Key Contacts
-
-- **Issue**: #381
-- **Branch**: feat/issues381
-- **Status**: Ready for development
-- **Reports Location**: Root of GasGuard directory
-
----
-
-**Last Updated**: June 1, 2026  
-**Status**: ✅ Detection Complete
diff --git a/ERROR_ENUM_STANDARDIZATION_REPORT.md b/ERROR_ENUM_STANDARDIZATION_REPORT.md
deleted file mode 100644
index 4f21250..0000000
--- a/ERROR_ENUM_STANDARDIZATION_REPORT.md
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,356 +0,0 @@
-# Error Enum Standardization Detection Report
-
-**Date**: June 1, 2026  
-**Status**: ⚠️ **INCONSISTENCIES DETECTED**  
-**Scope**: `rules/stellar/errors/` & Cross-module error definitions
-
----
-
-## Executive Summary
-
-Detected **6 major inconsistencies** in error enum and error class definitions across TypeScript and Rust code. Multiple incompatible `ValidationError` definitions and inconsistent error class patterns reduce maintainability and debugging quality.
-
-**Impact**: 
-- Duplicate type definitions causing potential type conflicts
-- Inconsistent error handling patterns across modules
-- Reduced API contract clarity
-
----
-
-## 🔴 Critical Inconsistencies
-
-### 1. ValidationError Interface Fragmentation
-
-**Problem**: Three incompatible definitions of `ValidationError` interface exist in separate modules.
-
-#### Definition A: Config-Based (Path-Oriented)
-**File**: [src/config/validator.ts](src/config/validator.ts#L25)
-```typescript
-export interface ValidationError {
-  path: string;        // Dot notation: "system.environment"
-  message: string;
-  code: string;        // Machine-readable code
-}
-```
-**Usage**: Config file validation, JSON path-based errors  
-**Modules Importing**: `config/validator.ts`
-
----
-
-#### Definition B: Field-Based (Request-Oriented)
-**File**: [apps/api/src/validation/base.validator.ts](apps/api/src/validation/base.validator.ts#L3)
-```typescript
-export interface ValidationError {
-  field: string;       // Form field name
-  message: string;
-  value?: any;         // Actual value that failed
-  constraint: string;  // Constraint name (e.g., "max_length")
-}
-```
-**Usage**: HTTP request validation  
-**Modules Importing**: Analysis validator, Schema definitions
-
----
-
-#### Definition C: Duplicate of B
-**File**: [apps/api/src/schemas/analysis.schema.ts](apps/api/src/schemas/analysis.schema.ts#L153)
-```typescript
-export interface ValidationError {
-  field: string;
-  message: string;
-  value?: any;
-  constraint: string;
-}
-```
-**Status**: ⚠️ **Duplicate** of Definition B  
-**Problem**: Redundant definition increases confusion
-
----
-
-### 2. Custom Error Classes - Inconsistent Patterns
-
-**Problem**: Three different patterns for custom error classes
-
-| Pattern | File | Class | Implementation | Issues |
-|---------|------|-------|-----------------|--------|
-| **Constructor-Only** | [stellar/errors.ts](apps/api/src/validation/rpc/stellar/errors.ts) | `RpcValidationError` | Minimal, only name | No structured error data |
-| **Rich Constructor** | [config/validator.ts](src/config/validator.ts#L100) | `ConfigValidationError` | Errors array + summary message | Good but unique pattern |
-| **Interface** | [error.middleware.ts](apps/api/src/middleware/error.middleware.ts#L4) | `CustomError` | Optional statusCode, code, details | Not a class - interface only |
-
-#### RpcValidationError (Minimal)
-[apps/api/src/validation/rpc/stellar/errors.ts](apps/api/src/validation/rpc/stellar/errors.ts)
-```typescript
-export class RpcValidationError extends Error {
-  constructor(message: string) {
-    super(message);
-    this.name = "RpcValidationError";
-  }
-}
-// ❌ Cannot access structured error info, no code, no timestamp
-```
-
-#### ConfigValidationError (Rich)
-[src/config/validator.ts](src/config/validator.ts#L100)
-```typescript
-export class ConfigValidationError extends Error {
-  constructor(
-    public readonly errors: ValidationError[],
-    public readonly warnings: ValidationWarning[],
-  ) {
-    const summary = errors.map((e) => `  [${e.code}] ${e.path}: ${e.message}`).join('\n');
-    super(`Config validation failed with ${errors.length} error(s):\n${summary}`);
-    this.name = 'ConfigValidationError';
-  }
-}
-// ✅ Rich error data, but unique pattern
-```
-
-#### CustomError (Interface)
-[apps/api/src/middleware/error.middleware.ts](apps/api/src/middleware/error.middleware.ts#L4)
-```typescript
-export interface CustomError extends Error {
-  statusCode?: number;
-  code?: string;
-  details?: any;
-}
-// ❌ Interface (not class) - cannot enforce constructor
-```
-
----
-
-### 3. Error Response Envelope Inconsistencies
-
-**Problem**: Two slightly different response structures in different schemas
-
-#### Format A: Base Error Response
-[apps/api/src/middleware/error.middleware.ts](apps/api/src/middleware/error.middleware.ts#L24)
-```typescript
-export interface ApiErrorResponse {
-  error: {
-    code: string;
-    message: string;
-    details?: any;
-    timestamp: string;
-    requestId: string;
-  };
-}
-```
-
-#### Format B: Extended with Validation Errors
-[apps/api/src/schemas/analysis.schema.ts](apps/api/src/schemas/analysis.schema.ts#L160)
-```typescript
-export interface ApiErrorResponse {
-  error: {
-    code: string;
-    message: string;
-    details?: any;
-    timestamp: string;
-    requestId: string;
-  };
-  validationErrors?: ValidationError[];  // Different structure
-}
-```
-
-**Problem**: Same interface name, different shapes → Type confusion at runtime
-
----
-
-### 4. Rust Error Enum Inconsistencies
-
-#### SorobanParseError (Using thiserror)
-[packages/rules/src/soroban/mod.rs](packages/rules/src/soroban/mod.rs#L115)
-```rust
-#[derive(Debug, thiserror::Error)]
-pub enum SorobanParseError {
-    #[error("Failed to parse Soroban contract: {0}")]
-    ParseError(String),
-    
-    #[error("Missing required Soroban macro: {0}")]
-    MissingMacro(String),
-    
-    #[error("Invalid contract structure: {0}")]
-    InvalidStructure(String),
-    
-    #[error("IO error: {0}")]
-    IoError(#[from] std::io::Error),
-}
-```
-**Pattern**: `thiserror::Error` with descriptive variants  
-**Strength**: Automatic Display implementation
-
----
-
-#### PipelineError (Manual Implementation)
-[libs/rule-engine/src/lib.rs](libs/rule-engine/src/lib.rs#L39)
-```rust
-#[derive(Debug, Clone)]
-pub enum PipelineError {
-    CircularDependency(Vec<String>),
-    MissingDependency(String),
-    RuleExecutionFailed(String),
-}
-
-impl std::fmt::Display for PipelineError {
-    fn fmt(&self, f: &mut std::fmt::Formatter<'_>) -> std::fmt::Result {
-        match self {
-            PipelineError::CircularDependency(cycle) => {
-                write!(f, "Circular dependency detected: {}", cycle.join(" -> "))
-            }
-            // ...
-        }
-    }
-}
-```
-**Pattern**: Manual Display + Clone trait  
-**Problem**: More boilerplate, inconsistent with SorobanParseError
-
----
-
-## 📊 Inconsistency Matrix
-
-```
-Module                          | ValidationError | Error Class      | Response Format
---------------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
-config/validator.ts             | ✅ V1 (path)    | ConfigError     | Custom
-api/validation/base.validator   | ❌ V2 (field)   | None (interface)| None
-api/schemas/analysis.schema     | ❌ V2 (field)   | AnalysisError   | V1 + extras
-api/middleware/error.middleware | ❌ None         | CustomError     | V1
-api/validation/rpc/stellar      | ❌ None         | RpcError        | None
-```
-
----
-
-## ✅ Standardization Checklist
-
-### Phase 1: Create Unified Error Types Module
-
-- [ ] Create `src/common/errors/` directory structure
-- [ ] Define canonical `ValidationError` interface (unified)
-- [ ] Define base `GasGuardError` class
-- [ ] Define specialized error classes (extends GasGuardError):
-  - `ValidationError`
-  - `ConfigurationError`
-  - `RpcError`
-  - `PipelineError`
-  - `AnalysisError`
-
-### Phase 2: Standardize TypeScript
-
-- [ ] Create [src/common/errors/index.ts](src/common/errors/index.ts)
-- [ ] Update [src/config/validator.ts](src/config/validator.ts) to use unified types
-- [ ] Update [apps/api/src/validation/rpc/stellar/errors.ts](apps/api/src/validation/rpc/stellar/errors.ts)
-- [ ] Update [apps/api/src/middleware/error.middleware.ts](apps/api/src/middleware/error.middleware.ts)
-- [ ] Update [apps/api/src/validation/base.validator.ts](apps/api/src/validation/base.validator.ts)
-- [ ] Update [apps/api/src/schemas/analysis.schema.ts](apps/api/src/schemas/analysis.schema.ts)
-
-### Phase 3: Standardize Rust
-
-- [ ] Update [packages/rules/src/soroban/mod.rs](packages/rules/src/soroban/mod.rs) to use `thiserror`
-- [ ] Update [libs/rule-engine/src/lib.rs](libs/rule-engine/src/lib.rs) to use `thiserror`
-- [ ] Define common error module in Rust (packages/rules/src/errors/)
-
-### Phase 4: Update Consumers
-
-- [ ] Audit all imports of ValidationError
-- [ ] Audit all error class catches/throws
-- [ ] Update error handling in middleware
-- [ ] Update error handling in validators
-- [ ] Add integration tests for error standardization
-
----
-
-## 🎯 Standardization Goals
-
-### TypeScript Standard
-
-```typescript
-// Base error class
-export abstract class GasGuardError extends Error {
-  abstract readonly code: string;
-  readonly timestamp: Date = new Date();
-  readonly details?: Record<string, any>;
-
-  constructor(
-    message: string,
-    details?: Record<string, any>
-  ) {
-    super(message);
-    this.name = this.constructor.name;
-    this.details = details;
-    Object.setPrototypeOf(this, new.target.prototype);
-  }
-}
-
-// Unified validation error
-export interface ValidationErrorDetail {
-  path?: string;        // For config errors (dot notation)
-  field?: string;       // For request errors
-  code: string;         // Machine-readable error code
-  message: string;      // Human-readable message
-  value?: any;          // Actual value that failed validation
-  constraint?: string;  // Constraint that failed
-}
-
-// Specialized error classes
-export class ValidationError extends GasGuardError {
-  code = 'VALIDATION_ERROR';
-  constructor(
-    message: string,
-    public errors: ValidationErrorDetail[],
-    details?: Record<string, any>
-  ) {
-    super(message, details);
-  }
-}
-```
-
-### Rust Standard
-
-```rust
-// Standard error enum with thiserror
-#[derive(Debug, thiserror::Error)]
-pub enum GasGuardError {
-    #[error("Validation failed: {message}")]
-    Validation {
-        message: String,
-        code: String,
-        #[source]
-        source: Option<Box<dyn std::error::Error>>,
-    },
-    
-    #[error("Configuration error: {0}")]
-    Configuration(String),
-    
-    #[error("RPC error: {0}")]
-    Rpc(String),
-    
-    #[error(transparent)]
-    Io(#[from] std::io::Error),
-}
-```
-
----
-
-## 📈 Expected Benefits
-
-| Metric | Before | After |
-|--------|--------|-------|
-| **Error Type Definitions** | 6 conflicting | 1 unified |
-| **Error Class Patterns** | 4 different | 1 standard |
-| **Response Formats** | 2 variants | 1 canonical |
-| **Maintainability** | Low | High |
-| **Type Safety** | Medium | High |
-| **Debugging Speed** | Slow | Fast |
-
----
-
-## 🔗 References
-
-- [Error Handling Best Practices](https://www.typescriptlang.org/docs/handbook/2/narrowing.html#using-type-predicates)
-- [Rust Error Handling](https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/ch09-00-error-handling.html)
-- [thiserror Crate Docs](https://docs.rs/thiserror/latest/thiserror/)
-
----
-
-**Report Generated**: 2026-06-01  
-**Status**: Ready for implementation
diff --git a/ERROR_ENUM_STANDARDIZATION_SUMMARY.md b/ERROR_ENUM_STANDARDIZATION_SUMMARY.md
deleted file mode 100644
index efebd45..0000000
--- a/ERROR_ENUM_STANDARDIZATION_SUMMARY.md
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,280 +0,0 @@
-# Error Enum Standardization - Summary Report
-
-**Date**: June 1, 2026  
-**Branch**: `feat/issues381`  
-**Status**: ✅ **DETECTION COMPLETE**
-
----
-
-## 🎯 Mission
-
-Detect inconsistent custom error definitions to improve maintainability and debugging quality in GasGuard.
-
----
-
-## ✅ Detection Results
-
-### Summary Statistics
-
-| Metric | Count | Status |
-|--------|-------|--------|
-| **Inconsistent ValidationError Definitions** | 3 | ❌ Critical |
-| **Custom Error Classes** | 4 | ❌ Inconsistent |
-| **Error Response Formats** | 2 | ⚠️ Duplicated |
-| **Rust Error Patterns** | 2 | ⚠️ Inconsistent |
-| **Files Requiring Updates** | 7+ | 📋 Documented |
-
----
-
-## 🔴 Key Findings
-
-### 1. ValidationError Fragmentation (3 Variants)
-
-**Variant A - Config-Based** ([src/config/validator.ts](src/config/validator.ts#L25))
-```typescript
-{ path: string, message: string, code: string }
-```
-- Used for: Config file validation with dot-notation paths
-- Problem: Cannot be used for field-based request validation
-
----
-
-**Variant B - Field-Based** ([apps/api/src/validation/base.validator.ts](apps/api/src/validation/base.validator.ts#L3))
-```typescript
-{ field: string, message: string, value?: any, constraint: string }
-```
-- Used for: HTTP request/form field validation
-- Problem: Cannot be used for config validation, duplicate definition exists
-
----
-
-**Variant C - Duplicate** ([apps/api/src/schemas/analysis.schema.ts](apps/api/src/schemas/analysis.schema.ts#L153))
-```typescript
-// Exact duplicate of Variant B
-```
-- Problem: Redundant definition increases confusion and maintenance burden
-
----
-
-### 2. Custom Error Classes - 4 Patterns
-
-| Class | Pattern | Location | Issues |
-|-------|---------|----------|--------|
-| `RpcValidationError` | Constructor-only | [stellar/errors.ts](apps/api/src/validation/rpc/stellar/errors.ts) | No structured data, no code |
-| `ConfigValidationError` | Rich constructor | [config/validator.ts](src/config/validator.ts#L100) | Unique pattern, cannot extend |
-| `CustomError` | Interface | [error.middleware.ts](apps/api/src/middleware/error.middleware.ts#L4) | Not a class, cannot enforce |
-| None | Response-only | [analysis.schema.ts](apps/api/src/schemas/analysis.schema.ts) | No class for structured errors |
-
-**Impact**: 
-- Cannot catch errors consistently
-- No standard error code property
-- No standard timestamp property
-- Difficult to extend with new error types
-
----
-
-### 3. Error Response Format Duplication
-
-**Base Format** ([error.middleware.ts](apps/api/src/middleware/error.middleware.ts#L24))
-```typescript
-{
-  error: { code, message, details, timestamp, requestId }
-}
-```
-
-**Extended Format** ([analysis.schema.ts](apps/api/src/schemas/analysis.schema.ts#L160))
-```typescript
-{
-  error: { code, message, details, timestamp, requestId },
-  validationErrors?: ValidationError[]  // ← Different structure
-}
-```
-
-**Problem**: Same interface name, different shapes at runtime
-
----
-
-### 4. Rust Error Pattern Inconsistency
-
-**Using thiserror** ([packages/rules/src/soroban/mod.rs](packages/rules/src/soroban/mod.rs#L115))
-```rust
-#[derive(Debug, thiserror::Error)]
-pub enum SorobanParseError { ... }
-```
-✅ Automatic Display, clean syntax
-
-**Manual Display** ([libs/rule-engine/src/lib.rs](libs/rule-engine/src/lib.rs#L39))
-```rust
-#[derive(Debug, Clone)]
-pub enum PipelineError { ... }
-impl std::fmt::Display for PipelineError { ... }
-```
-❌ More boilerplate, inconsistent approach
-
----
-
-## 📊 Impact Analysis
-
-### Maintainability Issues
-- **Type Confusion**: 3 ValidationError definitions cause import conflicts
-- **Copy-Paste Errors**: Developers uncertain which error to use
-- **Debugging Difficulty**: Inconsistent error properties across modules
-- **Code Review Burden**: Each error type has different structure
-
-### Debugging Quality Impact
-- ❌ No guaranteed error codes in all errors
-- ❌ No guaranteed timestamps in all errors
-- ❌ Inconsistent error response formats
-- ❌ Cannot programmatically handle error types
-
-### Risk Assessment
-- **Low Severity**: Different patterns are manageable
-- **Medium Risk**: Duplication causes maintenance issues
-- **High Priority**: Growing codebase will exacerbate issues
-
----
-
-## ✨ Solution Overview
-
-### Unified Error Architecture
-
-#### Phase 1: Create Unified Error Module ✅
-```
-src/common/errors/
-├── index.ts              # Main exports
-├── base.error.ts         # Base class
-├── types.ts              # Shared interfaces
-├── validation.error.ts   # Validation errors
-├── configuration.error.ts # Config errors
-├── rpc.error.ts          # RPC errors
-└── pipeline.error.ts     # Pipeline errors
-```
-
-#### Phase 2: Standardize ValidationErrorDetail
-```typescript
-interface ValidationErrorDetail {
-  path?: string;        // Config validation (dot notation)
-  field?: string;       // Request validation (field name)
-  code: string;         // Machine-readable: "INVALID_EMAIL"
-  message: string;      // Human-readable
-  value?: any;          // Failed value
-  constraint?: string;  // Failed constraint
-}
-```
-
-#### Phase 3: Standard Error Base Class
-```typescript
-abstract class GasGuardError extends Error {
-  abstract readonly code: string;
-  readonly timestamp: Date = new Date();
-  readonly details?: Record<string, any>;
-  toJSON(): object;
-}
-```
-
-#### Phase 4: Consistent Rust Errors
-All Rust enums use `#[derive(Debug, thiserror::Error)]` pattern
-
----
-
-## 📈 Expected Benefits
-
-| Aspect | Current | After Standardization |
-|--------|---------|----------------------|
-| **Error Type Definitions** | 6 conflicting | 1 unified |
-| **Error Classes** | 4 patterns | 1 standard base |
-| **Response Formats** | 2 variants | 1 canonical |
-| **Type Safety** | Medium | High |
-| **Debugging Speed** | ~30 min | ~5 min |
-| **Code Duplication** | High | Low |
-
----
-
-## 📋 Deliverables
-
-### 1. Detection Report ✅
-📄 [ERROR_ENUM_STANDARDIZATION_REPORT.md](ERROR_ENUM_STANDARDIZATION_REPORT.md)
-- Complete analysis of all inconsistencies
-- File-by-file comparison
-- Specific line references
-- Standardization goals
-
-### 2. Implementation Plan ✅
-📄 [ERROR_ENUM_STANDARDIZATION_IMPLEMENTATION_PLAN.md](ERROR_ENUM_STANDARDIZATION_IMPLEMENTATION_PLAN.md)
-- 5-phase implementation roadmap
-- Code examples for each phase
-- Migration checklist
-- Testing strategy
-- Effort estimation (~14 hours)
-
-### 3. Analysis Summary
-📄 This document (you are here)
-
----
-
-## 🚀 Next Steps
-
-### Immediate (Today)
-1. Review detection report for accuracy
-2. Review implementation plan feasibility
-3. Assign owner for implementation
-4. Schedule implementation sprint
-
-### Short-term (This Sprint)
-1. Implement Phase 1: Create unified error module
-2. Add comprehensive tests
-3. Update TypeScript error definitions
-4. Code review and merge
-
-### Medium-term (Next Sprint)
-1. Migrate Rust error definitions
-2. Update all consuming code
-3. Add integration tests
-4. Deploy and monitor
-
----
-
-## 📊 Files to Review
-
-### Detection Results
-- [ERROR_ENUM_STANDARDIZATION_REPORT.md](ERROR_ENUM_STANDARDIZATION_REPORT.md) - Detailed findings
-- [ERROR_ENUM_STANDARDIZATION_IMPLEMENTATION_PLAN.md](ERROR_ENUM_STANDARDIZATION_IMPLEMENTATION_PLAN.md) - Action items
-
-### Files with Inconsistencies
-1. [src/config/validator.ts](src/config/validator.ts) - ConfigValidationError class
-2. [apps/api/src/validation/rpc/stellar/errors.ts](apps/api/src/validation/rpc/stellar/errors.ts) - RpcValidationError class
-3. [apps/api/src/middleware/error.middleware.ts](apps/api/src/middleware/error.middleware.ts) - CustomError interface
-4. [apps/api/src/validation/base.validator.ts](apps/api/src/validation/base.validator.ts) - ValidationError interface (Variant B)
-5. [apps/api/src/schemas/analysis.schema.ts](apps/api/src/schemas/analysis.schema.ts) - ValidationError interface (Variant C, duplicate)
-6. [packages/rules/src/soroban/mod.rs](packages/rules/src/soroban/mod.rs) - SorobanParseError enum
-7. [libs/rule-engine/src/lib.rs](libs/rule-engine/src/lib.rs) - PipelineError enum
-
----
-
-## ✅ Verification
-
-All findings have been:
-- ✅ Cross-referenced with source files
-- ✅ Validated against actual code
-- ✅ Documented with line numbers
-- ✅ Categorized by severity
-- ✅ Provided with solutions
-
----
-
-## 📞 Contact & Questions
-
-For questions about:
-- **Detection methodology**: See [ERROR_ENUM_STANDARDIZATION_REPORT.md](ERROR_ENUM_STANDARDIZATION_REPORT.md#-critical-inconsistencies)
-- **Implementation approach**: See [ERROR_ENUM_STANDARDIZATION_IMPLEMENTATION_PLAN.md](ERROR_ENUM_STANDARDIZATION_IMPLEMENTATION_PLAN.md)
-- **Code changes**: Review the specific files listed above
-
----
-
-**Report Status**: ✅ **COMPLETE AND READY FOR ACTION**
-
-**Generated**: June 1, 2026  
-**Branch**: feat/issues381  
-**Effort to Implement**: ~14 hours  
-**Impact**: High (maintainability & debugging)  
-**Risk**: Low (additive changes, backwards compatible)
diff --git a/FILE_STRUCTURE_GUIDE.md b/FILE_STRUCTURE_GUIDE.md
deleted file mode 100644
index 093b1f5..0000000
--- a/FILE_STRUCTURE_GUIDE.md
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,318 +0,0 @@
-# 📂 State Variable Packing Detection - File Structure Overview
-
-## 📍 Implementation Location
-
-```
-/workspaces/GasGuard/
-├── packages/rules/src/
-│   ├── optimization/                          # NEW: Optimization module
-│   │   ├── mod.rs                            # Module exports
-│   │   ├── README.md                         # Implementation guide
-│   │   └── storage/                          # Storage optimization rules
-│   │       ├── mod.rs                        # Storage module exports
-│   │       ├── state_variable_packing.rs     # Core detection logic ⭐
-│   │       └── state_variable_packing.tests.rs # Test suite
-│   │
-│   ├── solidity/
-│   │   ├── mod.rs                            # MODIFIED: Updated exports
-│   │   └── state_variable_packing.rs         # NEW: Solidity rule ⭐
-│   │
-│   └── lib.rs                                # MODIFIED: Added optimization exports
-│
-└── docs/
-    ├── STATE_VARIABLE_PACKING.md             # NEW: Core documentation ⭐
-    ├── STATE_VARIABLE_PACKING_INTEGRATION.md # NEW: Integration guide ⭐
-    └── STATE_VARIABLE_PACKING_REFACTORING.md # NEW: Refactoring examples ⭐
-
-PACKING_IMPLEMENTATION_SUMMARY.md             # NEW: This summary ⭐
-```
-
-## 📄 File Descriptions
-
-### Core Implementation Files
-
-#### 1. **state_variable_packing.rs** (Core Logic)
-**Location**: `packages/rules/src/optimization/storage/state_variable_packing.rs`
-**Size**: ~250 lines
-
-**Key Components**:
-- `VariableInfo` struct - State variable metadata
-- `PackingOpportunity` struct - Detected opportunity
-- `get_type_size()` - Size calculation for types
-- `is_packable_type()` - Packability check
-- `detect_packing_opportunities()` - Main detection algorithm
-- `find_consecutive_packable_groups()` - Variable grouping
-- Unit tests
-
-**Usage**:
-```rust
-use gasguard_rules::detect_packing_opportunities;
-```
-
-#### 2. **state_variable_packing.rs** (Solidity Rule)
-**Location**: `packages/rules/src/solidity/state_variable_packing.rs`
-**Size**: ~80 lines
-
-**Key Components**:
-- `StateVariablePackingRule` struct
-- Implements `Rule` trait
-- `analyze()` method for UnifiedAST
-- Integration with rule engine
-
-**Usage**:
-```rust
-use gasguard_rules::StateVariablePackingRule;
-```
-
-#### 3. **state_variable_packing.tests.rs** (Test Suite)
-**Location**: `packages/rules/src/optimization/storage/state_variable_packing.tests.rs`
-**Size**: ~300 lines
-
-**Test Coverage**:
-- 11 comprehensive tests
-- Type size validation
-- Packability checking
-- Packing scenarios
-- Edge cases
-
-**Run Tests**:
-```bash
-cargo test -p gasguard-rules state_variable_packing
-```
-
-### Module Files
-
-#### 4. **optimization/mod.rs**
-**Location**: `packages/rules/src/optimization/mod.rs`
-**Purpose**: Re-exports optimization module components
-
-#### 5. **storage/mod.rs**
-**Location**: `packages/rules/src/optimization/storage/mod.rs`
-**Purpose**: Re-exports storage optimization components
-
-### Documentation Files
-
-#### 6. **STATE_VARIABLE_PACKING.md** (Core Documentation)
-**Location**: `docs/STATE_VARIABLE_PACKING.md`
-**Size**: ~400 lines
-
-**Contents**:
-- Overview and motivation
-- Why storage optimization matters
-- Storage slot sizes reference table
-- Practical before/after examples
-- Detection algorithm explanation
-- Gas savings estimation
-- Best practices
-- Rule details and usage
-- Limitations and considerations
-- Future enhancements
-
-**Read when**: Understanding storage optimization fundamentals
-
-#### 7. **STATE_VARIABLE_PACKING_INTEGRATION.md** (Integration Guide)
-**Location**: `docs/STATE_VARIABLE_PACKING_INTEGRATION.md`
-**Size**: ~350 lines
-
-**Contents**:
-- Using detection engine directly
-- Integrating with rule engine
-- CLI usage examples
-- Custom analysis tool integration
-- Real-world token contract example
-- Step-by-step integration walkthrough
-- Common patterns
-- Performance benchmarks
-- Integration checklist
-- Example report formats
-
-**Read when**: Integrating packing detection into projects
-
-#### 8. **STATE_VARIABLE_PACKING_REFACTORING.md** (Refactoring Guide)
-**Location**: `docs/STATE_VARIABLE_PACKING_REFACTORING.md`
-**Size**: ~500 lines
-
-**Contents**:
-- Complete refactoring examples:
-  - Simple ERC20 contract
-  - NFT contract with flags
-  - DeFi protocol
-- Before/after comparisons
-- Gas improvement analysis
-- Migration strategies
-- Proxy pattern usage
-- Testing optimizations
-- Benchmarking results
-- Implementation checklist
-- Common mistakes to avoid
-
-**Read when**: Implementing optimizations in actual contracts
-
-#### 9. **optimization/README.md** (Implementation Details)
-**Location**: `packages/rules/src/optimization/README.md`
-**Size**: ~400 lines
-
-**Contents**:
-- Implementation structure diagram
-- Component descriptions
-- Core functions explanation
-- Usage examples (basic and complex)
-- Packing efficiency examples
-- How detection works (5 steps)
-- Performance characteristics
-- Configuration options
-- Future enhancements
-- Related documentation
-- Integration points
-- Notes and acceptance criteria
-
-**Read when**: Understanding implementation details
-
-#### 10. **PACKING_IMPLEMENTATION_SUMMARY.md** (Summary)
-**Location**: `/workspaces/GasGuard/PACKING_IMPLEMENTATION_SUMMARY.md`
-
-**Contents**:
-- Requirements checklist
-- Deliverables overview
-- Quick start guide
-- Feature list
-- Test results
-- Architecture overview
-- Files created/modified
-- Learning resources
-- Quality assurance info
-- Next steps
-
-**Read when**: Getting a complete overview of implementation
-
-### Modified Files
-
-#### 11. **lib.rs** (Exports)
-**Location**: `packages/rules/src/lib.rs`
-**Changes**:
-- Added `pub mod optimization`
-- Added `pub mod solidity`
-- Added optimization exports to public API
-- Exports: `detect_packing_opportunities`, `VariableInfo`, `PackingOpportunity`, etc.
-
-#### 12. **solidity/mod.rs** (Module Updates)
-**Location**: `packages/rules/src/solidity/mod.rs`
-**Changes**:
-- Added `pub mod state_variable_packing`
-- Added re-export of `StateVariablePackingRule`
-
-## 🎯 Quick Navigation
-
-### For Different User Types
-
-**📚 Researchers/Learners**:
-1. Start: [STATE_VARIABLE_PACKING.md](docs/STATE_VARIABLE_PACKING.md)
-2. Examples: [STATE_VARIABLE_PACKING_REFACTORING.md](docs/STATE_VARIABLE_PACKING_REFACTORING.md)
-3. Deep dive: [optimization/README.md](packages/rules/src/optimization/README.md)
-
-**👨‍💻 Developers**:
-1. Start: [optimization/README.md](packages/rules/src/optimization/README.md)
-2. Integration: [STATE_VARIABLE_PACKING_INTEGRATION.md](docs/STATE_VARIABLE_PACKING_INTEGRATION.md)
-3. Code: Review `state_variable_packing.rs` files
-4. Tests: [state_variable_packing.tests.rs](packages/rules/src/optimization/storage/state_variable_packing.tests.rs)
-
-**🚀 Smart Contract Engineers**:
-1. Start: [STATE_VARIABLE_PACKING_REFACTORING.md](docs/STATE_VARIABLE_PACKING_REFACTORING.md)
-2. Integration: [STATE_VARIABLE_PACKING_INTEGRATION.md](docs/STATE_VARIABLE_PACKING_INTEGRATION.md)
-3. Reference: [STATE_VARIABLE_PACKING.md](docs/STATE_VARIABLE_PACKING.md)
-
-**📊 Project Managers**:
-1. Start: [PACKING_IMPLEMENTATION_SUMMARY.md](PACKING_IMPLEMENTATION_SUMMARY.md)
-2. Examples: [STATE_VARIABLE_PACKING_REFACTORING.md](docs/STATE_VARIABLE_PACKING_REFACTORING.md) (Examples section)
-
-## 📊 File Statistics
-
-| Category | Files | Lines | Purpose |
-|----------|-------|-------|---------|
-| Core Logic | 2 | ~330 | Detection algorithms |
-| Tests | 1 | ~300 | Test coverage |
-| Modules | 3 | ~30 | Organization |
-| Docs | 4 | ~1,650 | Education & guidance |
-| Summary | 2 | ~200 | Overview |
-| **Total** | **12** | **~2,510** | Complete system |
-
-## 🔍 Content Mapping
-
-### Understanding "What" (Why Packing Matters)
-→ [STATE_VARIABLE_PACKING.md](docs/STATE_VARIABLE_PACKING.md) Section: "Why It Matters"
-
-### Understanding "How" (Algorithm Details)
-→ [optimization/README.md](packages/rules/src/optimization/README.md) Section: "How Detection Works"
-
-### Understanding "Examples" (Real-world cases)
-→ [STATE_VARIABLE_PACKING_REFACTORING.md](docs/STATE_VARIABLE_PACKING_REFACTORING.md) Section: "Complete Refactoring Examples"
-
-### Using the Code
-→ [STATE_VARIABLE_PACKING_INTEGRATION.md](docs/STATE_VARIABLE_PACKING_INTEGRATION.md) Section: "How to Use in Your Project"
-
-### Implementation Details
-→ [packages/rules/src/optimization/README.md](packages/rules/src/optimization/README.md) Section: "Key Components"
-
-### Testing
-→ [packages/rules/src/optimization/storage/state_variable_packing.tests.rs](packages/rules/src/optimization/storage/state_variable_packing.tests.rs)
-
-## ✅ Verification Checklist
-
-Use this to verify all files are in place:
-
-```bash
-# Navigate to workspace
-cd /workspaces/GasGuard
-
-# Check core implementation files
-[ -f packages/rules/src/optimization/mod.rs ] && echo "✓ optimization/mod.rs"
-[ -f packages/rules/src/optimization/README.md ] && echo "✓ optimization/README.md"
-[ -f packages/rules/src/optimization/storage/mod.rs ] && echo "✓ storage/mod.rs"
-[ -f packages/rules/src/optimization/storage/state_variable_packing.rs ] && echo "✓ state_variable_packing.rs (core)"
-[ -f packages/rules/src/optimization/storage/state_variable_packing.tests.rs ] && echo "✓ state_variable_packing.tests.rs"
-[ -f packages/rules/src/solidity/state_variable_packing.rs ] && echo "✓ state_variable_packing.rs (solidity)"
-
-# Check documentation
-[ -f docs/STATE_VARIABLE_PACKING.md ] && echo "✓ STATE_VARIABLE_PACKING.md"
-[ -f docs/STATE_VARIABLE_PACKING_INTEGRATION.md ] && echo "✓ STATE_VARIABLE_PACKING_INTEGRATION.md"
-[ -f docs/STATE_VARIABLE_PACKING_REFACTORING.md ] && echo "✓ STATE_VARIABLE_PACKING_REFACTORING.md"
-
-# Check summary
-[ -f PACKING_IMPLEMENTATION_SUMMARY.md ] && echo "✓ PACKING_IMPLEMENTATION_SUMMARY.md"
-```
-
-## 🔗 Cross-References
-
-### Documentation Internal Links
-- STATE_VARIABLE_PACKING.md
-  ↔ STATE_VARIABLE_PACKING_INTEGRATION.md
-  ↔ STATE_VARIABLE_PACKING_REFACTORING.md
-
-### Code Structure Links
-- optimization/mod.rs → storage/mod.rs → state_variable_packing.rs
-- solidity/mod.rs → state_variable_packing.rs (Solidity rule)
-- lib.rs → All public exports
-
-### Test to Implementation Links
-- state_variable_packing.tests.rs
-  → state_variable_packing.rs (core logic)
-  → state_variable_packing.rs (solidity rule)
-
-## 📚 Additional Resources
-
-- **Solidity Docs**: https://docs.soliditylang.org/en/latest/internals/layout_in_storage.html
-- **EVM Opcodes**: https://www.evm.codes/
-- **Gas Optimization**: Check project documentation
-
-## 🎓 Usage Flow
-
-1. **Read**: [PACKING_IMPLEMENTATION_SUMMARY.md](PACKING_IMPLEMENTATION_SUMMARY.md)
-2. **Understand**: [STATE_VARIABLE_PACKING.md](docs/STATE_VARIABLE_PACKING.md)
-3. **Learn**: [STATE_VARIABLE_PACKING_INTEGRATION.md](docs/STATE_VARIABLE_PACKING_INTEGRATION.md)
-4. **Implement**: [STATE_VARIABLE_PACKING_REFACTORING.md](docs/STATE_VARIABLE_PACKING_REFACTORING.md)
-5. **Reference**: [optimization/README.md](packages/rules/src/optimization/README.md)
-6. **Review**: Code files and tests
-
----
-
-**All files are now in place and ready for use! 🚀**
diff --git a/PACKING_EXECUTIVE_SUMMARY.md b/PACKING_EXECUTIVE_SUMMARY.md
deleted file mode 100644
index 8cdfd8c..0000000
--- a/PACKING_EXECUTIVE_SUMMARY.md
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,275 +0,0 @@
-# 🎯 State Variable Packing Detection - Executive Summary
-
-## Project Completion Overview
-
-The **State Variable Packing Detection** system has been successfully implemented in the GasGuard project. This system detects opportunities to optimize smart contract storage by packing state variables more efficiently.
-
-## ✅ What Was Built
-
-### 🔧 Core System (Production-Ready)
-
-1. **Detection Engine** (`state_variable_packing.rs`)
-   - Analyzes variable ordering in contracts
-   - Calculates storage slot efficiency
-   - Detects packing opportunities
-   - Generates actionable suggestions
-
-2. **Rule Integration** (`solidity/state_variable_packing.rs`)
-   - Integrates with GasGuard rule engine
-   - Supports UnifiedAST analysis
-   - Produces rule violations with suggestions
-
-3. **Module Structure**
-   - `packages/rules/src/optimization/`
-   - `packages/rules/src/optimization/storage/`
-   - Proper module organization and exports
-
-### 📚 Documentation (Comprehensive)
-
-| Document | Purpose | Length |
-|----------|---------|--------|
-| [STATE_VARIABLE_PACKING.md](docs/STATE_VARIABLE_PACKING.md) | Core concepts & algorithms | ~400 lines |
-| [STATE_VARIABLE_PACKING_INTEGRATION.md](docs/STATE_VARIABLE_PACKING_INTEGRATION.md) | How to integrate & use | ~350 lines |
-| [STATE_VARIABLE_PACKING_REFACTORING.md](docs/STATE_VARIABLE_PACKING_REFACTORING.md) | Real-world examples & patterns | ~500 lines |
-| [packages/rules/src/optimization/README.md](packages/rules/src/optimization/README.md) | Implementation guide | ~400 lines |
-
-### 🧪 Test Suite (11 Tests)
-
-Comprehensive coverage including:
-- Type size calculations
-- Packability checks
-- Packing scenarios
-- Edge cases
-- Complex real-world patterns
-
-## 📊 Key Features
-
-### ✨ Detection Capabilities
-- ✅ Analyzes all Solidity primitive types
-- ✅ Identifies packable and non-packable types
-- ✅ Groups consecutive variables by slot
-- ✅ Calculates wasted space
-- ✅ Generates optimization suggestions
-- ✅ Respects variable ordering
-
-### 🎯 Type Support
-```
-Packable Types:
-- uint8 to uint248
-- int8 to int248
-- bool (1 byte)
-- address (20 bytes)
-- bytes1 to bytes31
-
-Non-Packable Types:
-- uint256, bytes32 (full slots)
-- strings, bytes (dynamic)
-- mappings
-- arrays
-```
-
-### 💡 Optimization Impact
-```
-Typical Results:
-- Storage slots reduced: 30-50%
-- Gas per multi-read: 50-75% reduction
-- Gas per multi-write: 50-75% reduction
-- Deployment size: 3-5% smaller
-```
-
-## 🚀 How to Use
-
-### Quick Start (3 Steps)
-
-```rust
-// 1. Import
-use gasguard_rules::detect_packing_opportunities;
-
-// 2. Prepare data
-let variables = vec![
-    VariableInfo { name: "flag", type_name: "bool", ... },
-    VariableInfo { name: "count", type_name: "uint8", ... },
-];
-
-// 3. Detect
-let opportunities = detect_packing_opportunities(variables);
-```
-
-### With Rule Engine
-
-```rust
-use gasguard_rules::{RuleEngine, StateVariablePackingRule};
-
-let engine = RuleEngine::new()
-    .add_rule(Box::new(StateVariablePackingRule));
-
-let violations = engine.analyze(code)?;
-```
-
-## 📁 File Structure
-
-```
-New Implementation:
-✓ packages/rules/src/optimization/mod.rs
-✓ packages/rules/src/optimization/storage/mod.rs
-✓ packages/rules/src/optimization/storage/state_variable_packing.rs
-✓ packages/rules/src/optimization/storage/state_variable_packing.tests.rs
-✓ packages/rules/src/optimization/README.md
-✓ packages/rules/src/solidity/state_variable_packing.rs
-✓ docs/STATE_VARIABLE_PACKING.md
-✓ docs/STATE_VARIABLE_PACKING_INTEGRATION.md
-✓ docs/STATE_VARIABLE_PACKING_REFACTORING.md
-
-Modified Files:
-✓ packages/rules/src/lib.rs
-✓ packages/rules/src/solidity/mod.rs
-
-Summary Files:
-✓ PACKING_IMPLEMENTATION_SUMMARY.md
-✓ FILE_STRUCTURE_GUIDE.md
-```
-
-## 💰 Business Value
-
-### Gas Savings Example
-
-**Token Contract Optimization**:
-```
-Before: 5 storage slots
-After:  3 storage slots
-Savings: 40% fewer storage slots
-
-Per-operation savings:
-- Multi-read: 8,400 gas → 2,100 gas (75% reduction)
-- Multi-write: 20,000 gas → 5,000 gas (75% reduction)
-
-Annual impact for 10M transactions:
-- Before: 200M gas
-- After: 50M gas
-- Savings: 150M gas ≈ $1,500+ in gas fees (at 20 gwei)
-```
-
-## 🎓 Learning Path
-
-### For Different Roles
-
-**👤 Smart Contract Developers**
-1. Read: [STATE_VARIABLE_PACKING_REFACTORING.md](docs/STATE_VARIABLE_PACKING_REFACTORING.md)
-2. Implement: Use examples to optimize contracts
-3. Reference: [STATE_VARIABLE_PACKING.md](docs/STATE_VARIABLE_PACKING.md)
-
-**👨‍💻 Platform Integrators**
-1. Read: [packages/rules/src/optimization/README.md](packages/rules/src/optimization/README.md)
-2. Study: [STATE_VARIABLE_PACKING_INTEGRATION.md](docs/STATE_VARIABLE_PACKING_INTEGRATION.md)
-3. Implement: Integrate with your tools
-
-**📚 Researchers**
-1. Overview: [STATE_VARIABLE_PACKING.md](docs/STATE_VARIABLE_PACKING.md)
-2. Deep Dive: [packages/rules/src/optimization/README.md](packages/rules/src/optimization/README.md)
-3. Code: Review implementation files
-
-**🔍 Auditors/QA**
-1. Tests: [state_variable_packing.tests.rs](packages/rules/src/optimization/storage/state_variable_packing.tests.rs)
-2. Examples: [STATE_VARIABLE_PACKING_REFACTORING.md](docs/STATE_VARIABLE_PACKING_REFACTORING.md)
-3. Coverage: [PACKING_IMPLEMENTATION_SUMMARY.md](PACKING_IMPLEMENTATION_SUMMARY.md)
-
-## ✅ Acceptance Criteria - All Met
-
-| Requirement | Status | Evidence |
-|------------|--------|----------|
-| Analyze variable ordering | ✅ | Core algorithm & tests |
-| Suggest packing | ✅ | PackingOpportunity suggestions |
-| Packing opportunities detected | ✅ | 11 test cases covering scenarios |
-
-## 🔗 Integration Points
-
-### Rule Engine Integration
-```rust
-engine.register_rule(Box::new(StateVariablePackingRule));
-```
-
-### Direct API Usage
-```rust
-use gasguard_rules::detect_packing_opportunities;
-```
-
-### CLI Integration
-```bash
-gasguard analyze --rule state-variable-packing contract.sol
-```
-
-## 📈 Metrics & Performance
-
-### Code Quality
-- ✅ Well-commented functions
-- ✅ Comprehensive error handling
-- ✅ ~2,500 lines of code + documentation
-- ✅ Modular design
-
-### Performance
-- Time: O(n) where n = number of variables
-- Space: O(n)
-- Typical runtime: <1ms for 100+ variables
-
-### Test Coverage
-- ✅ 11 unit tests
-- ✅ Multiple integration scenarios
-- ✅ Edge cases covered
-- ✅ Real-world patterns tested
-
-## 🎁 Deliverables Summary
-
-| Type | Count | Status |
-|------|-------|--------|
-| Core Implementation Files | 2 | ✅ Complete |
-| Module Organization Files | 3 | ✅ Complete |
-| Test Files | 1 | ✅ Complete |
-| Documentation Files | 4 | ✅ Complete |
-| Summary/Guide Files | 2 | ✅ Complete |
-| Modified Files | 2 | ✅ Updated |
-| **Total** | **14** | **✅ All Done** |
-
-## 🚀 Ready for Production
-
-The State Variable Packing Detection system is:
-- ✅ Fully implemented
-- ✅ Comprehensively documented
-- ✅ Thoroughly tested
-- ✅ Integrated with rule engine
-- ✅ Ready for immediate use
-
-## 📞 Next Steps for Users
-
-### Immediate Actions
-1. Review [STATE_VARIABLE_PACKING.md](docs/STATE_VARIABLE_PACKING.md)
-2. Run the test suite
-3. Analyze your first contract
-4. Review suggestions
-
-### Optimization Implementation
-1. Select high-impact contracts
-2. Use [STATE_VARIABLE_PACKING_REFACTORING.md](docs/STATE_VARIABLE_PACKING_REFACTORING.md) examples
-3. Implement struct packing
-4. Test thoroughly
-5. Deploy with confidence
-
-## 📚 Complete Documentation Index
-
-- [PACKING_IMPLEMENTATION_SUMMARY.md](PACKING_IMPLEMENTATION_SUMMARY.md) - Implementation overview
-- [FILE_STRUCTURE_GUIDE.md](FILE_STRUCTURE_GUIDE.md) - File organization
-- [STATE_VARIABLE_PACKING.md](docs/STATE_VARIABLE_PACKING.md) - Core documentation
-- [STATE_VARIABLE_PACKING_INTEGRATION.md](docs/STATE_VARIABLE_PACKING_INTEGRATION.md) - Integration guide
-- [STATE_VARIABLE_PACKING_REFACTORING.md](docs/STATE_VARIABLE_PACKING_REFACTORING.md) - Practical examples
-- [optimization/README.md](packages/rules/src/optimization/README.md) - Implementation details
-
-## 🎉 Project Completion Status
-
-**State Variable Packing Detection System: COMPLETE ✅**
-
-All requirements met, fully documented, tested, and ready for production use.
-
----
-
-**Start optimizing your smart contracts today!** 🚀
-
-*For questions or issues, refer to the comprehensive documentation linked above.*
diff --git a/PACKING_IMPLEMENTATION_SUMMARY.md b/PACKING_IMPLEMENTATION_SUMMARY.md
deleted file mode 100644
index ca732c3..0000000
--- a/PACKING_IMPLEMENTATION_SUMMARY.md
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,348 +0,0 @@
-# ✅ State Variable Packing Detection - Implementation Summary
-
-## 🎯 Completed Requirements
-
-### ✅ Requirements
-- [x] Analyze variable ordering
-- [x] Suggest packing opportunities
-
-### ✅ Acceptance Criteria
-- [x] Packing opportunities detected
-
-## 📦 Deliverables
-
-### 1. Core Detection Engine
-- **File**: `packages/rules/src/optimization/storage/state_variable_packing.rs`
-- **Functions**:
-  - `get_type_size()` - Calculate storage size for any Solidity type
-  - `is_packable_type()` - Determine if type can be packed
-  - `detect_packing_opportunities()` - Main detection algorithm
-  - `find_consecutive_packable_groups()` - Group variables by slot
-
-### 2. Solidity Rule Integration
-- **File**: `packages/rules/src/solidity/state_variable_packing.rs`
-- **Class**: `StateVariablePackingRule`
-- **Integrates** with rule engine and AST analysis
-
-### 3. Module Structure
-```
-packages/rules/src/
-├── optimization/
-│   ├── mod.rs (exports)
-│   └── storage/
-│       ├── mod.rs (exports)
-│       ├── state_variable_packing.rs (core logic)
-│       └── state_variable_packing.tests.rs (tests)
-└── solidity/
-    ├── mod.rs (updated with new rule)
-    └── state_variable_packing.rs (rule implementation)
-```
-
-### 4. Comprehensive Documentation
-
-#### Core Documentation
-- **[STATE_VARIABLE_PACKING.md](docs/STATE_VARIABLE_PACKING.md)**
-  - Overview and why it matters
-  - Storage slot sizes table
-  - Practical examples (before/after)
-  - Detection algorithm explanation
-  - Gas savings estimation
-  - Best practices
-
-#### Integration Guide
-- **[STATE_VARIABLE_PACKING_INTEGRATION.md](docs/STATE_VARIABLE_PACKING_INTEGRATION.md)**
-  - How to use in projects
-  - Rule engine integration
-  - CLI usage
-  - Custom analysis tools
-  - Real-world token contract example
-  - Integration checklist
-
-#### Refactoring Examples
-- **[STATE_VARIABLE_PACKING_REFACTORING.md](docs/STATE_VARIABLE_PACKING_REFACTORING.md)**
-  - Complete refactoring examples
-  - ERC20-like contract
-  - NFT contract with flags
-  - DeFi protocol
-  - Migration strategies
-  - Testing optimizations
-  - Benchmarking results
-  - Common mistakes
-
-#### Implementation Readme
-- **[packages/rules/src/optimization/README.md](packages/rules/src/optimization/README.md)**
-  - Architecture overview
-  - Component descriptions
-  - Usage examples
-  - Test suite info
-  - Performance characteristics
-
-### 5. Test Suite
-- **File**: `packages/rules/src/optimization/storage/state_variable_packing.tests.rs`
-- **Coverage**: 11 comprehensive tests
-  - Type size calculations
-  - Packability checks
-  - Simple packing scenarios
-  - Mixed type packing
-  - Address packing
-  - Non-packable types
-  - Consecutive grouping
-  - Complex scenarios
-  - Efficiency calculations
-
-## 🚀 Usage Quick Start
-
-### Installation
-```rust
-use gasguard_rules::{
-    VariableInfo, 
-    detect_packing_opportunities,
-    get_type_size,
-    is_packable_type
-};
-```
-
-### Basic Usage
-```rust
-let variables = vec![
-    VariableInfo {
-        name: "enabled".to_string(),
-        type_name: "bool".to_string(),
-        size_bytes: 1,
-        line_number: 5,
-    },
-    VariableInfo {
-        name: "count".to_string(),
-        type_name: "uint8".to_string(),
-        size_bytes: 1,
-        line_number: 6,
-    },
-];
-
-let opportunities = detect_packing_opportunities(variables);
-for opp in opportunities {
-    println!("Suggestion: {}", opp.suggestion);
-}
-```
-
-### With Rule Engine
-```rust
-use gasguard_rules::{RuleEngine, StateVariablePackingRule};
-
-let engine = RuleEngine::new()
-    .add_rule(Box::new(StateVariablePackingRule));
-
-let violations = engine.analyze(code)?;
-```
-
-## 📊 Key Features
-
-### 1. Type Support
-- ✅ `uint8` - `uint248` (various sizes)
-- ✅ `int8` - `int248` (various sizes)
-- ✅ `bool` (1 byte)
-- ✅ `address` (20 bytes)
-- ✅ `bytesN` for N = 1 to 31
-- ✅ Proper handling of non-packable types
-
-### 2. Algorithm Features
-- ✅ Consecutive variable grouping
-- ✅ Slot size optimization (32 bytes)
-- ✅ Wasted space calculation
-- ✅ Order-preserving analysis
-- ✅ Packability detection
-
-### 3. Detection Capabilities
-- ✅ Identifies 2+ variable groupings
-- ✅ Calculates byte usage breakdown
-- ✅ Generates actionable suggestions
-- ✅ Provides optimization metrics
-- ✅ Respects variable ordering
-
-## 📈 Optimization Impact
-
-### Typical Results
-| Metric | Value |
-|--------|-------|
-| Storage slots reduced | 30-50% |
-| Gas per multi-read | 50-75% reduction |
-| Gas per multi-write | 50-75% reduction |
-| Deployment size | 3-5% smaller |
-
-### Example: Token Contract
-```
-Before: 5 slots
-After:  3 slots
-Savings: 40% slot reduction
-Gas impact: ~12,800 gas per multi-operation
-```
-
-## 🧪 Test Results
-
-All tests passing:
-- ✅ Type size calculations
-- ✅ Packability checks
-- ✅ Packing opportunity detection
-- ✅ Edge cases and complex scenarios
-- ✅ Efficiency calculations
-
-## 📋 Detection Examples
-
-### Example 1: Simple Bool Packing
-```
-Input: 2 bool variables
-Output: PackingOpportunity {
-    variables: [flag1, flag2],
-    total_bytes: 2,
-    wasted_bytes: 30,
-    suggestion: "Pack these variables into a struct: flag1, flag2 (saves 30 byte(s) per slot)"
-}
-```
-
-### Example 2: Mixed Type Packing
-```
-Input: bool + uint8 + uint16
-Output: PackingOpportunity {
-    variables: [enabled, status, count],
-    total_bytes: 4,
-    wasted_bytes: 28,
-    suggestion: "Pack these variables into a struct: enabled, status, count (saves 28 byte(s) per slot)"
-}
-```
-
-### Example 3: Address with Flags
-```
-Input: address + bool + uint8 + uint8
-Output: PackingOpportunity {
-    variables: [user, enabled, status, nonce],
-    total_bytes: 23,
-    wasted_bytes: 9,
-    suggestion: "Pack these variables into a struct: user, enabled, status, nonce (saves 9 byte(s) per slot)"
-}
-```
-
-## 🔧 Architecture
-
-### Component Hierarchy
-```
-StateVariablePackingRule (Solidity integration)
-    ↓
-    uses
-    ↓
-detect_packing_opportunities() (Main engine)
-    ↓
-    uses
-    ↓
-get_type_size() + is_packable_type() + find_consecutive_packable_groups()
-    ↓
-    produces
-    ↓
-PackingOpportunity (Result structs with suggestions)
-```
-
-### Data Flow
-```
-Contract AST
-    ↓
-Extract VariableInfo
-    ↓
-Filter Packable Types
-    ↓
-Group into Slots
-    ↓
-Calculate Metrics
-    ↓
-Generate Suggestions
-    ↓
-PackingOpportunity Results
-```
-
-## 📚 Files Created/Modified
-
-### New Files Created
-1. `packages/rules/src/optimization/mod.rs`
-2. `packages/rules/src/optimization/storage/mod.rs`
-3. `packages/rules/src/optimization/storage/state_variable_packing.rs`
-4. `packages/rules/src/optimization/storage/state_variable_packing.tests.rs`
-5. `packages/rules/src/optimization/README.md`
-6. `packages/rules/src/solidity/state_variable_packing.rs`
-7. `docs/STATE_VARIABLE_PACKING.md`
-8. `docs/STATE_VARIABLE_PACKING_INTEGRATION.md`
-9. `docs/STATE_VARIABLE_PACKING_REFACTORING.md`
-
-### Files Modified
-1. `packages/rules/src/lib.rs` (added optimization module exports)
-2. `packages/rules/src/solidity/mod.rs` (added state_variable_packing rule)
-
-## 🎓 Learning Resources
-
-### For Users
-1. Start with [STATE_VARIABLE_PACKING.md](docs/STATE_VARIABLE_PACKING.md)
-2. Review examples in [STATE_VARIABLE_PACKING_REFACTORING.md](docs/STATE_VARIABLE_PACKING_REFACTORING.md)
-3. Integrate using [STATE_VARIABLE_PACKING_INTEGRATION.md](docs/STATE_VARIABLE_PACKING_INTEGRATION.md)
-
-### For Developers
-1. Read [packages/rules/src/optimization/README.md](packages/rules/src/optimization/README.md)
-2. Study the core logic in `state_variable_packing.rs`
-3. Review test suite for usage patterns
-4. Check `solidity/state_variable_packing.rs` for integration
-
-## 🔍 Quality Assurance
-
-### Testing
-- ✅ Unit tests in test module
-- ✅ Integration test examples
-- ✅ Edge case coverage
-- ✅ Type handling verification
-
-### Code Quality
-- ✅ Well-documented functions
-- ✅ Clear error handling
-- ✅ Modular design
-- ✅ Follows project patterns
-
-### Documentation
-- ✅ API documentation
-- ✅ Usage examples
-- ✅ Integration guides
-- ✅ Refactoring patterns
-- ✅ Best practices
-
-## 🚀 Next Steps
-
-### Immediate Usage
-1. Import the packing detection module
-2. Analyze your contracts
-3. Implement suggestions
-4. Measure gas savings
-
-### Future Enhancements
-- [ ] Integration with solc storage layout reports
-- [ ] Automatic struct generation suggestions
-- [ ] Inter-slot optimization analysis
-- [ ] Dynamic type handling
-- [ ] Inheritance-aware packing
-- [ ] Access pattern analysis
-
-## 📞 Support & Questions
-
-### Documentation Links
-- Core: [docs/STATE_VARIABLE_PACKING.md](docs/STATE_VARIABLE_PACKING.md)
-- Integration: [docs/STATE_VARIABLE_PACKING_INTEGRATION.md](docs/STATE_VARIABLE_PACKING_INTEGRATION.md)
-- Examples: [docs/STATE_VARIABLE_PACKING_REFACTORING.md](docs/STATE_VARIABLE_PACKING_REFACTORING.md)
-- Implementation: [packages/rules/src/optimization/README.md](packages/rules/src/optimization/README.md)
-
-## ✨ Summary
-
-The State Variable Packing Detection system provides:
-
-- ✅ **Automated Analysis**: Detect packing opportunities instantly
-- ✅ **Type Support**: Handles all Solidity primitive types
-- ✅ **Smart Grouping**: Finds optimal variable combinations
-- ✅ **Actionable Suggestions**: Clear refactoring recommendations
-- ✅ **Gas Optimization**: Potentially 30-50% storage slot reduction
-- ✅ **Well-Documented**: Comprehensive guides and examples
-- ✅ **Production-Ready**: Tested and integrated with rule engine
-- ✅ **Extensible**: Easy to enhance with additional features
-
-**All acceptance criteria met! ✅**
diff --git a/PERSISTENT_STORAGE_USAGE_REPORT.md b/PERSISTENT_STORAGE_USAGE_REPORT.md
deleted file mode 100644
index a5fa8a3..0000000
--- a/PERSISTENT_STORAGE_USAGE_REPORT.md
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,356 +0,0 @@
-# Excessive Persistent Storage Usage Detection Report
-
-**Date**: June 1, 2026  
-**Status**: ⚠️ **DETECTION COMPLETE**  
-**Scope**: Soroban persistent storage analysis  
-**Issue**: #380 - Detect Excessive Persistent Storage Usage
-
----
-
-## Executive Summary
-
-Soroban's persistent storage incurs **long-term rent costs** based on ledger footprint size. Analysis reveals several patterns that may increase unnecessary storage costs:
-
-1. **Lack of explicit storage type guidance** - No clear distinction between instance, temporary, and persistent storage
-2. **Potential storage duplication** - Similar data stored in multiple places
-3. **Missing cleanup mechanisms** - No automated storage removal strategies
-4. **Inefficient data structures** - Large strings and unpacked data stored persistently
-
-**Impact**: Persistent storage rent can consume 10-50% of total contract operating costs.
-
----
-
-## 🔴 Storage Cost Model Overview
-
-### Soroban Storage Types
-
-Soroban provides three storage tiers with different cost characteristics:
-
-| Storage Type | Persistence | Rent Cost | Use Case | Lifetime |
-|--------------|-------------|-----------|----------|----------|
-| **Instance** | Single contract invocation | Minimal | Temporary computation | 1 transaction |
-| **Temporary** | Limited duration (~1 ledger) | Low | Scratch space, cache | ~1 hour |
-| **Persistent** | Indefinite | **HIGH** | State, balances, config | Indefinite |
-
-**Rent Formula for Persistent Storage**:
-```
-Annual Rent Cost = Ledger Footprint Size × Rent Rate
-                 = (Total Entry Bytes + 64 byte overhead per entry) × 0.00001 stroops/byte/ledger
-```
-
-### Example Rent Calculations
-
-For a contract with persistent storage:
-
-```
-Entry Size: 1 KB (1,024 bytes)
-Overhead:   64 bytes per entry
-Total:      1,088 bytes per entry
-
-Annual Cost = 1,088 bytes × 0.00001 stroops/byte/ledger × 365 days × 10 ledgers/day
-            ≈ 39.7 XLM/year per entry
-            ≈ $2-4 USD/year per entry (at typical XLM prices)
-```
-
-For a contract with 100 persistent entries:
-- Total storage: ~108 KB
-- **Annual rent: ~3,970 XLM** (~$240-400/year)
-
----
-
-## 📊 Analysis: Current Storage Patterns
-
-### 1. Storage Type Usage in Test Code
-
-**File**: [e2e/full_scan_tests.ts](e2e/full_scan_tests.ts#L353)
-
-```rust
-// Current pattern - using instance storage
-let from_balance = env.storage().instance().get(&from).unwrap_or(0);
-let from_balance_again = env.storage().instance().get(&from).unwrap_or(0); // Redundant read
-let to_balance = env.storage().instance().get(&to).unwrap_or(0);
-```
-
-**Issues**:
-- ❌ Multiple reads from storage (redundant in single transaction)
-- ❌ No distinction between instance (cheap) vs persistent (expensive)
-- ⚠️ Could be using persistent when instance would suffice
-
----
-
-### 2. Storage Patterns in Property Token Contract
-
-**File**: [apps/rust/property-token/src/storage.rs](apps/rust/property-token/src/storage.rs)
-
-**Observations**:
-```rust
-// Storage usage patterns:
-ADMIN.save(deps.storage, &admin)?;                    // Persistent entry
-TREASURY_BALANCE.save(deps.storage, &balance)?;       // Persistent entry
-FEE_BALANCES.save(deps.storage, &fees)?;              // Persistent entry
-METADATA.save(deps.storage, &metadata)?;              // Persistent entry
-```
-
-**Issues**:
-- ⚠️ All state stored in persistent storage (unavoidable for state)
-- ✅ Appropriate use case (permanent contract state)
-- ❓ Missing: Cleanup mechanisms for expired/obsolete entries
-
----
-
-### 3. Inefficient String Storage
-
-**File**: [e2e/full_scan_tests.ts](e2e/full_scan_tests.ts#L334)
-
-```rust
-pub expensive_metadata: String, // Expensive string storage
-```
-
-**Cost Analysis**:
-```
-String Storage Cost Example:
-- Contract metadata: "Property ownership transfer contract v2.1"
-- Size: ~45 bytes per entry
-- If stored as persistent: ≈ $1-2/year per contract
-
-For 1,000 contracts:
-- Total annual storage cost: $1,000-2,000
-```
-
----
-
-## ✅ Current Detection Results
-
-### 1. Explicit Persistent Storage Usage
-
-**Pattern Found**: Storage operations in [e2e/full_scan_tests.ts](e2e/full_scan_tests.ts#L353-L358)
-
-```rust
-env.storage().instance().set(&from, &(from_balance - amount));
-env.storage().instance().set(&to, &(to_balance + amount));
-```
-
-**Assessment**:
-- ⚠️ Using instance storage (appropriate for single transaction)
-- ✅ Not persisting balances in instance storage
-- ⚠️ Test code may not reflect actual deployment patterns
-
----
-
-### 2. State Variable Declarations
-
-**Pattern Found**: [apps/rust/property-token/src/storage.rs](apps/rust/property-token/src/storage.rs)
-
-**Current State Storage**:
-- `ADMIN` – Single address (20 bytes)
-- `TREASURY_BALANCE` – u128 number (16 bytes)
-- `AUTHORIZED_ROLES` – Map of role authorizations (variable size)
-- `METADATA` – Token metadata (variable size)
-- `CONFIG_VERSION` – Version number (8 bytes)
-- `FEE_BALANCES` – Map of fee accounts (variable size)
-
-**Rent Cost Estimate**:
-```
-Base state entries:       ~80 bytes
-Per-authorized-role:      ~50 bytes (address + bool)
-Typical roles (10):       ~500 bytes
-Metadata:                 ~200 bytes
-Fee balances (5 tokens):  ~250 bytes
-─────────────────────────────────
-Total per contract:       ~1,030 bytes
-Overhead (10 entries):    ~640 bytes
-─────────────────────────────────
-Total footprint:          ~1,670 bytes
-
-Annual rent (1,670 × 0.00001 stroops/byte/ledger × 3,650 ledgers/year):
-≈ 61 XLM/year (≈$3-5 USD)
-```
-
----
-
-## ⚠️ Identified Anti-Patterns
-
-### 1. **Lack of Storage Cleanup Strategy**
-
-**Problem**: No evidence of automatic storage entry removal or expiration
-
-**Example**:
-```rust
-// No cleanup mechanism visible
-// Fee entries accumulate indefinitely
-FEE_BALANCES.save(deps.storage, &fees)?;
-// When entries are removed?
-// → Never (no cleanup observed)
-```
-
-**Cost Impact**: Rent grows linearly with number of stored entries
-
----
-
-### 2. **Potential Storage Duplication**
-
-**Pattern**: Similar data stored in multiple entry types
-
-```
-Possible duplications:
-- Token metadata stored both in contract and in entries
-- Role information stored redundantly
-- Config version stored separately from config
-```
-
-**Cost**: Each duplicate costs separate rent
-
----
-
-### 3. **No Storage Type Optimization**
-
-**Current**: All state uses same storage (persistent)
-
-**Possible Improvements**:
-- Temporary cache for frequently-accessed data
-- Instance storage for computation-only data
-- Persistent only for true permanent state
-
----
-
-## 📋 Storage Usage Checklist
-
-### By Category
-
-#### ✅ Recommended Practices (Present)
-- [ ] State variables use appropriate persistence levels
-- [x] Core state (admin, balances) stored persistently
-- [ ] No obvious test-code storage patterns in production
-
-#### ❌ Issues Detected
-- [ ] **No cleanup mechanisms** for expired entries
-- [ ] **No storage usage monitoring** tools
-- [ ] **No cost optimization** per storage type
-- [ ] **Missing documentation** on storage strategy
-
-#### ⚠️ Warnings
-- [ ] Could benefit from storage compression
-- [ ] No batch storage operations visible
-- [ ] Missing storage migration patterns
-
----
-
-## 🔍 Rent Cost Sensitivity Analysis
-
-### How Storage Decisions Impact Annual Costs
-
-| Decision | Storage Size | Annual Rent | Cost Impact |
-|----------|--------------|-------------|------------|
-| Store full metadata | 500 bytes | ~18 XLM | $1-2 |
-| Compress metadata | 200 bytes | ~7 XLM | $0.40-0.80 |
-| Remove obsolete role | 50 bytes | ~2 XLM | $0.10-0.20 |
-| Batch 10 entries | 500 bytes | ~18 XLM | $1-2 |
-
-**Scaling Factor**: For 1,000 contracts, multiply costs by 1,000x
-
----
-
-## 💡 Improvement Opportunities
-
-### 1. Storage Cleanup Strategy
-**Impact**: Reduce rent by 20-30%
-**Effort**: Medium
-
-```rust
-// Example: Automatic cleanup on update
-pub fn cleanup_old_fees(env: &Env) {
-    let cutoff = env.ledger().timestamp() - (365 * 86400); // 1 year ago
-    // Delete entries older than cutoff
-}
-```
-
-### 2. Storage Type Optimization
-**Impact**: Reduce costs by 10-15%
-**Effort**: Low
-
-```rust
-// Use temporary for cache
-env.storage().temporary().set(&cache_key, &value);
-
-// Use persistent only for state
-env.storage().persistent().set(&state_key, &value);
-```
-
-### 3. Data Compression
-**Impact**: Reduce rent by 20-40%
-**Effort**: Medium
-
-```rust
-// Before: Store full metadata string
-let metadata = "Property ownership transfer protocol v2.1 - Stellar";
-env.storage().persistent().set(&key, &metadata)?;  // 50+ bytes
-
-// After: Store compressed format or hash
-let metadata_hash = sha256(&metadata);
-env.storage().persistent().set(&key, &metadata_hash)?; // 32 bytes
-```
-
-### 4. Storage Monitoring Tools
-**Impact**: Reduce rent by 5-10% (through awareness)
-**Effort**: Medium
-
-```typescript
-// Add storage analytics
-interface StorageMetrics {
-  totalBytes: number;
-  entriesCount: number;
-  annualRent: number;
-  projectedCost: number;
-}
-
-function analyzeStorageUsage(contract: SorobanContract): StorageMetrics {
-  // Calculate and report storage metrics
-}
-```
-
----
-
-## 📊 Risk Assessment
-
-| Risk | Severity | Probability | Impact |
-|------|----------|-------------|--------|
-| **Unbounded storage growth** | Medium | Low | 10-50x cost increase |
-| **No cleanup strategy** | Medium | High | Slow cost growth over time |
-| **Storage type confusion** | Low | Medium | Suboptimal cost allocation |
-| **No cost visibility** | Low | High | Unexpected expenses |
-
----
-
-## ✅ Verification Checklist
-
-- [ ] All persistent storage entries have documented lifecycle
-- [ ] Cleanup/expiration policies defined for each entry type
-- [ ] Storage type selection (instance/temporary/persistent) justified
-- [ ] Annual rent costs calculated and budgeted
-- [ ] Data compression evaluated for large entries
-- [ ] Monitoring/alerting for storage growth configured
-- [ ] Cost optimization tools integrated into development workflow
-
----
-
-## 📚 Documentation References
-
-- [Soroban Cost Model Spec](docs/soroban-cost-model-spec.md)
-- [Gas Library - Storage Access](docs/gas-library.md#1-inefficient-storage-access)
-- [Property Token Storage](apps/rust/property-token/src/storage.rs)
-- [E2E Storage Tests](e2e/full_scan_tests.ts#L353)
-
----
-
-## 🔗 Related Issues
-
-- Issue #380: Detect Excessive Persistent Storage Usage
-- Issue #221: Config Validation (storage optimization opportunity)
-- Issue #135: Config Migration (storage cleanup requirement)
-
----
-
-**Report Status**: ✅ **DETECTION COMPLETE**  
-**Recommendation**: Implement Phase 1 (Storage Monitoring)  
-**Next Steps**: Review Soroban storage architecture and optimization strategy
-