Skip to content

Frontend: Reviewer queue, review packet, decision, and findings UI #56

Description

@Abiorh001

Parent: #29
Depends on: #50, #34, #35, #37

Why

Week 3 explicitly calls for reviewer queue, review page, checker result panel, task guide panel, submission evidence panel, and review decision form. This is not covered by backend issues alone.

Roadmap Source

  • docs/roadmap_day_by_day_execution_plan.md Days 11-15
  • docs/operations_reviewer_workflow.md
  • docs/product_first_user_flows.md Flow 5

Scope

  • Reviewer queue view.
  • Review packet view with guide, task, submission, evidence, checker results, prior findings, and revision replay.
  • Structured findings form.
  • Decision form for accept, needs_revision, reject.
  • Reviewer quality/second-review indicators where backend data exists.

Acceptance Criteria

  • Reviewer can make a valid decision only when backend requirements are satisfied.
  • needs_revision and reject forms require findings.
  • accept requires evidence references/checklist confirmation.
  • UI clearly distinguishes checker-caused revision from human review revision.
  • Tests/demo evidence cover accept, needs_revision, and reject paths.

Contributor Fit

Core frontend issue for a contributor after review backend contracts land.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    area/frontendFrontend UI or demo/dashboard surfacearea/reviewHuman review, findings, review packets, reviewer qualityfocus/v0.1Current Workstream v0.1 roadmap focus; open to contributors unless explicitly assignedpriority/P0Required for v0.1 or the active roadmap checkpoint

    Type

    No type

    Fields

    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions