You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository was archived by the owner on Nov 9, 2017. It is now read-only.
Further to #233 I've identified another rather ambiguous use case. This time seen in Tables.
Style Guides only discuss the use of Standard Tables. But there appears to be a very common use of non-standard tables, for example, seen here in HTML Element Reference. Every reference subpage you click on shows the use of non-standard table with the .properties class.
So this time I question: the community standard experienced in the documentation vs the CSS style guide (and subsequently this add-on)? Has there been a style recommendation change? Or could, perhaps, this often used non-standard table be considered for inclusion in the CSS style guide? Therefore avoiding an error flag.
Further to #233 I've identified another rather ambiguous use case. This time seen in Tables.
Style Guides only discuss the use of Standard Tables. But there appears to be a very common use of non-standard tables, for example, seen here in HTML Element Reference. Every reference subpage you click on shows the use of non-standard table with the .properties class.
So this time I question: the community standard experienced in the documentation vs the CSS style guide (and subsequently this add-on)? Has there been a style recommendation change? Or could, perhaps, this often used non-standard table be considered for inclusion in the CSS style guide? Therefore avoiding an error flag.