The reference of symlink is copied, not the symlink itself. So this is related to issue #1. But during hash computation of a symlink, a bit more of the file is taken (presumably the path information of the symlink). Once the file is copied to backup, this hash in hashtable is inconsistent with the backup copy.
The reference of symlink is copied, not the symlink itself. So this is related to issue #1. But during hash computation of a symlink, a bit more of the file is taken (presumably the path information of the symlink). Once the file is copied to backup, this hash in hashtable is inconsistent with the backup copy.