Seeing that {vecnu}: x1 [seller] sells / vends x2 [goods / service / commodity] to buyer x3 for amount / cost / expense x4.; it makes no sense to have a different order for x3 and x4, {canja}; not even speaking about the pattern "object/from/to/via" appears oftenly.
current {canja}: x1 exchanges / trades / barters commodity x2 for x3 with x4; x1, x4 is a trader / merchant / businessman.
proposed {canja}: x1 exchanges / trades / barters commodity x2 to trader x3 for amount / cost x4.
Additionally, it seems that the two entities in relation through the exchange are symetric. Perhaps it will also need to have "x1 is a trader / merchant / businessman.", in top of "x3 is a trader / merchant / businessman."
Seeing that {vecnu}:
x1 [seller] sells / vends x2 [goods / service / commodity] to buyer x3 for amount / cost / expense x4.; it makes no sense to have a different order for x3 and x4, {canja}; not even speaking about the pattern "object/from/to/via" appears oftenly.current {canja}:
x1 exchanges / trades / barters commodity x2 for x3 with x4; x1, x4 is a trader / merchant / businessman.proposed {canja}:
x1 exchanges / trades / barters commodity x2 to trader x3 for amount / cost x4.Additionally, it seems that the two entities in relation through the exchange are symetric. Perhaps it will also need to have "x1 is a trader / merchant / businessman.", in top of "x3 is a trader / merchant / businessman."