Question about "Extending Configurations"

[zenoli]

Below I copied an example from the docs about extending configurations:

If I understand this correctly, extendedConfig should be either renamed to extendedModule (1)
or we should add .config in (2) or use .apply instead of .eval and remove .config in (3).

# Apply initial configuration
initialConfig = (wrappers.wrapperModules.tmux.eval {
  pkgs = pkgs;
  plugins = [ pkgs.tmuxPlugins.onedark-theme ];
}).config;

# Extend with additional configuration
extendedConfig = initialConfig.eval {     # <--(1)
  clock24 = false;
};   # <--(2)

# Access the wrapper
actualPackage = extendedConfig.config.wrapper;   # <--(3)

# Extend it again!
apackage = (actualPackage.eval {
  vimVisualKeys = true;
  modeKeys = "vi";
  statusKeys = "vi";
}).config.wrapper;

# and again!
packageAgain = apackage.wrap {
  prefix = "C-Space";
};

[BirdeeHub]

You are correct. I wanted to show the full .config.wrapper path but the extendedConfig name might be a bit confusing when its actually the raw result of evalModules

Which do you think is best? extendedModule, or apply?

[zenoli]

Are you ok with me spamming more understanding questions as discussions or should I use a different platform for this? (Or not spam at all?^^)

[BirdeeHub]

Spam here if ur gonna spam and hopefully people find it better than random reddit thread. Although... reddit is pretty indexable probably doesnt matter. But here I can find it and link it to ppl if they have the same question.

[zenoli]

I'll post here then. That reddit thread is becoming hard to navigate

[BirdeeHub]

I have updated it

[zenoli]

Way more clear now, nice!