@johanneshofmann87 suggested to have a wiki or something of the sort to have a more approachable reference / information resource than the PDF documentation.
Here is the first draft: https://github.com/johanneshofmann87/ALF/wiki
I would suggest to try Jupyter Book to that effect, since we can not only use Markdown to populate it, but also Jupyter Notebooks an LaTeX. I believe the main conceptual difference, would be that the JupyterBook source would be part of the same git repository (though in priniciple, we could also store it completely separately, similar to how the wiki does it). Here's a JupyterBook with Johannes' sources: https://jonasschwab.github.io/jupyterbook-test/
@johanneshofmann87 suggested to have a wiki or something of the sort to have a more approachable reference / information resource than the PDF documentation.
Here is the first draft: https://github.com/johanneshofmann87/ALF/wiki
I would suggest to try Jupyter Book to that effect, since we can not only use Markdown to populate it, but also Jupyter Notebooks an LaTeX. I believe the main conceptual difference, would be that the JupyterBook source would be part of the same git repository (though in priniciple, we could also store it completely separately, similar to how the wiki does it). Here's a JupyterBook with Johannes' sources: https://jonasschwab.github.io/jupyterbook-test/