document2llm/extended_requests_text.json at master · 2BlackCoffees/document2llm · GitHub

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
[
    {
        "request_name": "Summarize the slide",
        "request": "Please provide a summary of the slide within max 30 words.",
        "temperature": 0.6,
        "top_p": 0.6
    },
    {
        "request_name": "Ensure convincing roadmap message",
        "request": "Extract the roadmap out of the slide. Compare it against what a customer would expect. Provide compelling suggestions for improvement.",
        "temperature": 0.6,
        "top_p": 0.6
    },
    {
        "request_name": "Verify the what",
        "request": "Ensure that the 'WHAT' is clearly described and not overwhelmed by the 'HOW'.",
        "temperature": 0.3,
        "top_p": 0.2
    },
    {
        "request_name": "Experts feedback checks",
        "request": "Consider what an expert in the field of the slide might say if he reads it. Provide concrete and valuable suggest improvements.",
        "temperature": 0.3,
        "top_p": 0.2
    },
    {
        "request_name": "Slide memorability check",
        "request": "Summarize the main point of the slide in less than two sentences and provide the sentences. Suggest concrete and valuable improvements for the slide to ensure the 2 summarized sentences are easy to summarize from the slide and easy to remember.",
        "temperature": 0.3,
        "top_p": 0.2
    },
    {
        "request_name": "Slide title and openeing check",
        "request": "Review the title and opening paragraph of each slide for attention grabbing. Suggest improvements if they do not grab your attention.",
        "temperature": 0.3,
        "top_p": 0.2
    },
    {
        "request_name": "Slide audience check",
        "request": "Read the slide from the perspective of a sceptic, supporter, and unfamiliar reader. Suggest concrete and valuable improvements for each of such reviewer.",
        "temperature": 0.6,
        "top_p": 0.6
    },
    {
        "request_name": "Slide weakness checks",
        "request": "Identify the weakest parts of the slide (e.g., logic, structure, distinctiveness) and suggest improvements.",
        "temperature": 0.6,
        "top_p": 0.6
    },
    {
        "request_name": "Slide view from a harsh critic checks",
        "request": "Imagine what a harsh critic might say and provide concrete valuable improvement suggestions to address these concerns.",
        "temperature": 0.6,
        "top_p": 0.6
    },
    {
        "request_name": "Slide view from a debate critic checks",
        "request": "Imagine we are in a debate. Your job is to argue in opposition. What are your top 3 counterpoints for the text?",
        "temperature": 0.6,
        "top_p": 0.6
    },
    {
        "request_name": "Roadmap",
        "request": "Describe the detailed technical roadmap for innovation that appears from the slide content. Propose suggestion for improvement assuming a harsh critic wanted to make it disruptive.",
        "temperature": 0.6,
        "top_p": 0.6
    },
    {
        "request_name": "Verify the Flow",
        "request": "Ensure that the flow in the slide brings a comprehensive message that will not confuse the reader but instead brings a clear message regarding what the slide depicts.",
        "temperature": 0.6,
        "top_p": 0.6
    }
]